Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS KANDUNGAN GIZI DAN BAU LUMPUR IKAN BANDENG (Chanos chanos) DARI DUA LOKASI YANG BERBEDA H Hafiluddin; Yudhita Perwitasari; Slamet Budiarto
Jurnal Kelautan Vol 7, No 1: April (2014)
Publisher : Department of Marine Sciences, Trunojoyo University of Madura, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/jk.v7i1.795

Abstract

Bandeng (Chanos chanos) merupakan salah satu komoditas yang strategis untuk memenuhi kebutuhan protein yang relatif murah dan digemari oleh konsumen di Indonesia.Bau lumpur pada ikan umumnya pada ikan tawar disebabkan senyawa kimia yaitu 2-Methylisoborneol dan Geosmin.Tujuan untuk mengetahui kandungan kandungan gizi dan geosmin ikan bandeng (Chanos chanos) dari dua lokasi yang berbeda yaitu perairan tambak Lamongan dan Pamekasan.Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Uji Test-T dengan menggunakan dua faktor untuk analisa uji proksimat. Kandungan gizi ikan bandeng bervariasi, yaitu kadar air ikan bandeng Lamongan 74,71-76,06% dan Pamekasan 68,50-73,34%, protein ikan bandeng Lamongan 14,84-19,47 dan Pamekasan 21,29-23,53%.Bau lumpur ikan bandeng Lamongan mempunyai rata-rata 2,848 (sedikit berbau lumpur) dan Pamekasan 4,303 (sedikit sekali berbau lumpur).Kata Kunci: ikan bandeng, kandungan gizi, bau lumpurANALYSIS ON THE NUTRITION AND MUD SMELL OF MILKFISH (Chanos chanos) FROM TWO DIFFERENT LOCATIONSABSTRACTMilkfish (Chanos chanos) is one of strategic commodities for the fulfillment of protein needs that is relatively cheap and favored by consumers in Indonesia. The mud smell from the fish, usually freshwater fish, is caused by chemical compounds, namely 2-Methylisoborneol and Geosmin. The objective of this research was to find out the nutrition and geosmin of milkfishes (Chanos chanos) that were from two different locations, namely Lamongan and Pamekasan fish ponds. This research used testing method T-Test with two factors for proximate test analysis. The nutrition consisted in a milkfish varies, in which the water content contained in Lamongan milkfish was 74.71-76.06% whereas Pamekasan milkfish was 68.50-73.34% and the protein contained in Lamongan milkfish was 14.84-19.47 whereas Pamekasan milkfish was 21.29-23.53%. The mud smell of Lamongan milkfish was in average 2.848 (a bit mud smelling) whereas Pamekasan milkfish was 4.303 (hardly mud smelling).Keywords: milkfish, mud smell, nutrition
Analisis Prioritas Upgrading Untuk Rekomendasi Peningkatan Kinerja Sistim Manufaktur Secara Berkelanjutan Slamet Budiarto; S Suparno; Indung Sudarso
Jurnal Teknik Industri Vol. 13 No. 2 (2012): Agustus
Publisher : Department Industrial Engineering, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol13.No2.167-176

Abstract

The analysis is done by upgrading the priority, first create a model of activity with IDEF0 (Integrated Definition Language 0) To The Smallest activity. Verification is done by field officers, while the validation is done by software IDEF37. With regard that the activities that the model is a map of the activity. Then the next step don is weighting the importance of existing activities. Once the performance indicators of each activity is determined, then the analysis is then performed through the sorting and defining the activity of ICOM’s critical to determine which will be upgraded. Of data and processing is done, there are 627 ICOM’s are analyzed on the basis of performance indicators on a specific output. And consists of 15 stages are recommended for improved performance, assuming a single phase which comprises 30 ICOM’s performance will be improved within six months. The priority of upgrading is begined to upgrade technical specifications, human resources, and facilities at the activities planned production program. However, in general the activity plan programs and activities planned production capacity and desired material is the activity that most often experience upgrading in the first stage. Continuous performance improvement can be made with reference to the upgrading priority of phase II, III and so on. Evaluation upgrading needs to be done after the implementation of upgrading stage 3. It is useful to decide whether to do the upgrading stage IV or re-analyze priority.