Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah INTAJ qolamuna : Jurnal studi islam
Siti Khoirotul Ula
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Fikih Jurnalistik Sebagai Landasan Etika Bermedia Sosial Siti Khoirotul Ula
Qolamuna : Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): Februari 2017
Publisher : STIS MIFTAHUL ULUM LUMAJANG PRESS (STISMU PRESS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (824.674 KB)

Abstract

Perubahan-perubahan dalam pola komunikasi di era internet memungkinan setiap orang untuk aktif menggunakan media sosial. Para pengguna internet hampir tidak memiliki batasan atau etika khusus untuk menghormati pengguna pengguna internet lain di dunia maya, yang mana sebetulnya merupakan anggota masyarakat di kehidupan nyata. Oleh karena itu, batasan antara maya dan nyata menjadi tidak jelas. Etika-etika pada saat berinteraksi di dunia nyata terabaikan di dunia maya. Fenomena penggunaan sosial media tentunya bertentangan dengan umat Islam, sebagai bagian dari kesatuan masyarakat itu sendiri. Padahal, pada hukum Islam pengumpulan informasi atau berbicara tentang berita yang tidak benar adalah larangan. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk membuat masyarakat lebih berhati-hati mengenai fiqih jurnalisme. Bagi masyarakat yang menggunakan media sosial, hendaknya selain tidak mengganggu di dunia maya, seperti halnya berkata kasar, menyebar fintah, menyebar konten porno, dan juga menjual barang-barang ilegal. Kata kunci : Fiqh jurnalisme, Etika, Media Sosial
THE VIEW OF AHL AL-DZIMMAH THEORY REGARDING THE THOUGHTS OF THE INDONESIAN ULEMA COUNCIL (MUI) ABOUT POLICIES ON INTERFAITH SERVICES AT THE OFFICE OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS (KUA) Siti Khoirotul Ula
Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah INTAJ Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): middle path
Publisher : LP3M IAI Al-Qolam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35897/intaj.v8i2.1692

Abstract

This article discusses the stance of the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) regarding the Ministry of Religious Affairs' decision to transform Religious Affairs Offices (KUA) into service centres for all religions. The aim of this article is to analyse MUI's perspective on the policy related to religious services at KUA from the viewpoint of the ahlu dhimmah theory, a concept within the framework of Islamic governance. The research methodology employed in this article is qualitative research, relying on literature as the primary data source. Information for this study is drawn from the documents of the Eighth Ulama Fatwa Commission Meeting. The research findings indicate that, according to MUI, KUA should not be designated as a service centre for all religions in Indonesia. This decision is based on historical evidence showing that KUA, which operates under the Ministry of Religious Affairs, is specifically intended for Muslims as part of the compensation for the removal of seven words from the Jakarta Charter, which previously affirmed the obligation to uphold Islamic law for followers of Islam in Indonesia. The ideology that has replaced this is Pancasila. MUI also argues that issues related to religions other than Islam are significantly different from Islamic religious affairs, raising concerns about the potential for religious mixing if KUA becomes a service centre for all religions. MUI asserts that transforming KUA into a service centre for all religions contradicts existing laws and is not in line with the social realities of interfaith interactions. The implications of the analysis based on the ahlu dhimmah theory suggest that non-Muslims have the right to register marriages and receive implementation services at KUA. However, it is crucial that officials acting as "marriage registrars" adhere to the teachings of their respective religions to prevent any interfaith syncretizm.
Co-Authors