Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Islamic World and Politics Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Global Local Interactions: Journal of International Relations
Al Dina Maulidya
University of Muhammadiyah Malang
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
The Chinese vs Western Media Framing on Uygur Conflict Aucky Adi Kurniawan; Al Dina Maulidya; Khaerul Sa'ban; Indrawati Indrawati
Journal of Islamic World and Politics Vol 4, No 2 (2020): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (402.444 KB) | DOI: 10.18196/jiwp.4249

Abstract

This paper pays attention to the Uyghur conflict which became international news. A variety of reports about the Uygur appear with religious-based heroic narratives that corroborate discrimination, persecution, and all the miscience of the Chinese government against the Uyghur ethnic minority. As such, it aims to understand the difference in perspectives of the preaching of some Western mass media compared to the Chinese mass media in informing Uyghur related news. Compared to other ethnicity issues, the authors believed in certain interests behind the preaching of various online mass media to what was actually happening in Xinjiang. The author uses the framework of the framing theory of Pan Konciski and the constructivicist paradigm to interpret the news of the Uygur conflict.  The results of the study show Western media are more likely to have tendencies using words or sentences that drain the reader's emotions while Chinese media are more likely to be neutral in framing the news. It is a record for the authors that the public perception regarding the internationalization of issues occurring in a country can be influenced by how the media package news content.
Efektivitas Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Pulau Takeshima/Dokdo Melalui Jalur Non-Yuridis Al Dina Maulidya
Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Vol 5, No 1 (2022): Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (347.66 KB) | DOI: 10.33474/yur.v5i1.6523

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the Takeshima/Dokdo Island dispute resolution mechanism between Japan and South Korea through non-juridical channels. The dispute has been started since the Japanese occupation in South Korea, so in this paper the author wants to examine the dispute resolution mechanism that has been carried out by Japan and South Korea in their efforts to resolve the Takeshima/Dokdo Island dispute. This type of research is normative legal research that emphasizes the approach to legislation. The results of this study indicate that the settlement mechanism carried out by Japan and South Korea using non-judicial channels is still not effective. The two countries have negotiated twice, namely in 1998 and 2006. In the same year as the second negotiation, South Korea decided to free itself from the UNCLOS dispute resolution. Then in 2018 Japan established a permanent connection to the island of Takeshima/Dokdo. South Korea's refusal to take the dispute to the International Court of Justice and the failure of negotiations, have left ambiguity over the ownership status of Takeshima/Dokdo islands.
Efektivitas Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Pulau Takeshima/Dokdo Melalui Jalur Non-Yuridis Al Dina Maulidya
Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Vol 5 No 1 (2022): Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33474/yur.v5i1.6523

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the Takeshima/Dokdo Island dispute resolution mechanism between Japan and South Korea through non-juridical channels. The dispute has been started since the Japanese occupation in South Korea, so in this paper the author wants to examine the dispute resolution mechanism that has been carried out by Japan and South Korea in their efforts to resolve the Takeshima/Dokdo Island dispute. This type of research is normative legal research that emphasizes the approach to legislation. The results of this study indicate that the settlement mechanism carried out by Japan and South Korea using non-judicial channels is still not effective. The two countries have negotiated twice, namely in 1998 and 2006. In the same year as the second negotiation, South Korea decided to free itself from the UNCLOS dispute resolution. Then in 2018 Japan established a permanent connection to the island of Takeshima/Dokdo. South Korea's refusal to take the dispute to the International Court of Justice and the failure of negotiations, have left ambiguity over the ownership status of Takeshima/Dokdo islands.
The Urgency of Indonesia to Control Imports of Non-Hazardous and Toxic Waste (B3) in 2019 Al Dina Maulidya; Melina Nur Fitriah; Eva Yusnita Chandra
Global Local Interactions: Journal of International Relations Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): Global-Local Interactions: Journal of International Relations
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study discusses the urgency of Indonesia to implement the regulation of imports of non-hazardous and toxic waste (B3) in 2019. The background of this research is when there was an urging from Ministry of Environment and Forestry towards the Ministry of Trade to revise regulations related to the import of non-B3 waste in 2019. Other than that, the revision of the regulation on the import of non-B3 waste in the same month in 2019, also becomes the urgency of this research. This type of research is descriptive-qualitative research. To analyze the issues raised, this study will use Bryant's concept of environmental politics. There are three points behind the implementation of environmental politics based on Bryant's concept. First is the effect of the environment on the general environment of a country. The second is the existence of interstate relations, and the third is related to the emergence of non-state actors. Through the concept put forward by Bryant, the results of this study indicate that there are at least three urgencies of Indonesia in curbing the import of non-B3 waste in 2019. The first urgency is the emergence of hazardous waste (B3) for the environment and the health of the Indonesian people. Second, an increase in illegal imports of B3 waste in Indonesia. Third, the implementation of the Basel Convention regulations in Indonesia. The results of this study indicate that if the negative impact of the B3 waste content, and also the importance of Indonesia, has become the urgency behind this country's decision to curb the import of non-B3 waste.
Co-Authors Aucky Adi Kurniawan Eva Yusnita Chandra Indrawati Indrawati Khaerul Sa'ban Melina Nur Fitriah