Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology Jurnal Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada
- Sukadiyanto
Unknown Affiliation
Education Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbedaan Reaksi Emosional Antara Olahragawan Body Contact dan Non Body Contact Sukadiyanto, -
Jurnal Psikologi Vol 33, No 1 (2006)
Publisher : Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (442.39 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpsi.7085

Abstract

This research aimed to know the diffe-rence of emotional reaction status between athletes of body contact and non body con¬tact, and also aimed to know the difference of emotional reaction status between boys and girls. The research method is survey, and da¬ta collecting by questionnaire which consist of seven factors, that is desire, assertiveness, sensitivity, tension control, confidence, personal accountability, and self-discipline. In each factor consist of six statement item, three positive statement and three negative statements. Research populations are all athletes in Kabupaten Sleman, and with purposive sampling technique there were 204 boys and girls. Data analyzed by analysis of variance with level of significance 5%. Result of research indicate that: (1) There are difference of emotional reaction status between an athelete of body contact and non body contact, where an athelete of body contact higher than non body contact, (2) There are difference of emotional reaction status between sportsman of boys and girls, where boys higher than girls, and (3) There is no interaction between the kind of sports and the gender on the emotional reaction status. Keywords: emotional reaction, athelete, body contact, non body contact
Perbedaan Reaksi Emosional Antara Olahragawan Body Contact dan Non Body Contact Sukadiyanto, -
Jurnal Psikologi Vol 32, No 1 (2005)
Publisher : Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (348.022 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpsi.7961

Abstract

This research aimed to know the difference of emotional reaction status between athletes of body contact and non body contact, and also aimed to know the difference of emotional reaction status between boys and girls. The research method is survey, and datacollecting by questionnaire which consist of seven factors, that is desire, assertiveness, sensitivity, tension control, confidence, personal accountability, and self‐discipline. In each factorconsist of six statement item, three positive statement and three negative statements. Research populations are all athletes inKabupaten Sleman, and with purposive sampling technique there were 204 boys and girls. Data analyzed by analysis of variancewith level of significance 5%. Result of research indicate that: (1) There are difference of emotional reaction status between an athelete of body contact and non body contact, where an athelete of body contact higher than non body contact, (2) There aredifference of emotional reaction status between sportsman of boys and girls, where boys higher than girls, and (3) There is no interaction between the kind of sports and the gender on theemotional reaction status.
RELEVANSI KURIKULUM TAHUN 2002 PRODI PJKR TERHADAP KOMPETENSI LULUSANNYA - Sukadiyanto
Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia Volume 6, Nomor 2, Mei 2006 Edisi Khusus
Publisher : Departement of Sports Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences Yogyakarta State University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (121.767 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/jpji.v6i2.6236

Abstract

The expectation outcome of physical education health and recreation program (PJKR) FIKUNY as a physical educator teacher has four competence, that is (1) mastery of study area,(2) understanding of students, (3) mastery of educative learning, and (4) personalitydevelopment and professionalism. To be able to fulfill the competence standard andcertification as a beginner teacher it needed of some subject matter. The outcome target ofPJKR FIK UNY are saleable and competence in market work on their area. Because of thatrequire to supply by various skill and knowledge supporting the profession and duty as ateacher of physical education later. Pursuant to curriculum of PJKR 2002 there are somesubject matter less owning of relevance to candidate profession and duty as physical educator.On the contrary, there are some subject matter which still less of SKS and subject matterwhich ought to there is not yet written in curriculum PJKR 2002. Therefore, curriculum PJKR2002 specially and FIK UNY in general require to evaluate and studied to fulfill the competencestandard demand and certification as a beginner teacher of physical education.Keyword: PJKR 2002 curricullum, graduate competency.
Model Pembelajaran Kemampuan Koordinasi Pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar - Sukadiyanto
Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia Volume 3, No. 1, 2005
Publisher : Departement of Sports Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences Yogyakarta State University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (40.668 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/jpji.v3i1.6172

Abstract

The coordination is ability that constituting of basic movement and movementfundamental to various skill of athletic branch. It is require to be taught early possibly thatis since children age. Because learning coordination after passing childhood will get ofmany constraints for learner. Almost all children age there are at formal education level ofelementary school. The goal of physical education at elementary school ought to orientedfor enrichment various skill of all motor determined by ability of coordination. There areseven factors which determined coordination ability, that is: ability to (1) link, (2) differentiate,(3) balance, (4) adapt, (5) find and maintain rhythm, (6) react, and (7) change.Students of elementary school grouped become two groups, first, low group studentconsisting of class of I, II, and III, and second, upper group student consisting of class ofIV, V, and VI. Low group student is play group situation, so that is the best time to putdown base skill of motion. The upper group student is the best time to develop variousskills of athletics. All of the students at elementary school are potential for multi lateraltraining, and construction of various athletic skills.The items of coordination ability consist of recognition of feeling to object, controlling toobject, balance, reacting, and accuracy to object. The principle of study coordination atelementary school were started from easy to difficult, from simple to complex, from lightto heavy. That is needed teacher creativity to create a model of coordination learning. Itcould be exploit the environment as a media and a source of learning.Kata Kunci: Pembelajaran, Koordinasi, Siswa Sekolah dasar.
Perbedaan Reaksi Emosional Antara Olahragawan Body Contact dan Non Body Contact - Sukadiyanto
Jurnal Psikologi Vol 33, No 1 (2006)
Publisher : Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (442.39 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpsi.7085

Abstract

This research aimed to know the diffe-rence of emotional reaction status between athletes of body contact and non body con¬tact, and also aimed to know the difference of emotional reaction status between boys and girls. The research method is survey, and da¬ta collecting by questionnaire which consist of seven factors, that is desire, assertiveness, sensitivity, tension control, confidence, personal accountability, and self-discipline. In each factor consist of six statement item, three positive statement and three negative statements. Research populations are all athletes in Kabupaten Sleman, and with purposive sampling technique there were 204 boys and girls. Data analyzed by analysis of variance with level of significance 5%. Result of research indicate that: (1) There are difference of emotional reaction status between an athelete of body contact and non body contact, where an athelete of body contact higher than non body contact, (2) There are difference of emotional reaction status between sportsman of boys and girls, where boys higher than girls, and (3) There is no interaction between the kind of sports and the gender on the emotional reaction status. Keywords: emotional reaction, athelete, body contact, non body contact
Perbedaan Reaksi Emosional Antara Olahragawan Body Contact dan Non Body Contact - Sukadiyanto
Jurnal Psikologi Vol 32, No 1 (2005)
Publisher : Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (348.022 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpsi.7961

Abstract

This research aimed to know the difference of emotional reaction status between athletes of body contact and non body contact, and also aimed to know the difference of emotional reaction status between boys and girls. The research method is survey, and datacollecting by questionnaire which consist of seven factors, that is desire, assertiveness, sensitivity, tension control, confidence, personal accountability, and self‐discipline. In each factorconsist of six statement item, three positive statement and three negative statements. Research populations are all athletes inKabupaten Sleman, and with purposive sampling technique there were 204 boys and girls. Data analyzed by analysis of variancewith level of significance 5%. Result of research indicate that: (1) There are difference of emotional reaction status between an athelete of body contact and non body contact, where an athelete of body contact higher than non body contact, (2) There aredifference of emotional reaction status between sportsman of boys and girls, where boys higher than girls, and (3) There is no interaction between the kind of sports and the gender on theemotional reaction status.
Co-Authors