Mr. Sularto
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PENERAPAN ASAS ITIKAD BAIK TAHAP PRAKONTRAKTUAL PADA PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI PERUMAHAN Antari Innaka; Sa’ida Rusdiana; Mr. Sularto
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 24, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (351.675 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16122

Abstract

The good faith principle is present in the pre-contractual stage of Preliminary House Sale and Purchase Agreement because all three contractual stages are also characterised by good faith. This Preliminary Agreement precedes the actual House Sale and Purchase Agreement and we submit that the Preliminary Agreement is legally binding provided that it be honestly entered to. The legal remedy that is available for consumers who find the promises of their property agent in the Preliminary Agreement not included in the actual House Sale and Purchase Agreement is the Decree of State Minister for Public Housing No. 09/KPTS/M/1995. Asas itikad baik dilaksanakan dalam tahap prakontraktual pada perjanjian pendahuluan jual beli rumah karena ketiga tahapan kontrak selalu mengandung itikad baik. Dalam jual beli rumah ada perjanjian pendahuluan yang mendahului perjanjian jual beli yang sesungguhnya. Perjanjian pendahuluan itu tetap mempunyai kekatan mengikat berdasarkan kejujuran. Perlindungan hukum yang dapat digunakan konsumen ketika apa yang diperjanjikan oleh developer tidak tercantum dalam perjanjian pendahuluan adalah ketentuan Keputusan Menteri Negara Perumahan Rakyat No. 09/KPTS/M/1995.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM kreditur SEPARATIS DALAM KEPAILITAN Mr. Sularto
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 24, No 2 (2012)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (351.299 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16128

Abstract

The discharging of one’s debt by bankruptcy aims to provide creditors with fair distribution of assets. However, for secured creditors, (those holding mortgage rights, fiduciary collateral, and other in rem security rights) provisions concerning stay of execution and limited foreclosure time are not consistent with securities law, hence jeopardizing their interests. This article arrives into a conclusion that several adjustments need to be made by amending the existing statutory regulations and by stipulating a Government Regulation, in order to ensure legal certainty on whether the right of secured creditors to foreclose exists. Penyelesaian utang melalui lembaga kepailitan dimaksudkan untuk mendapatkan pembagian yang adil bagi para kreditur. Namun bagi kreditur separatis (pemegang gadai, jaminan fidusia, hak tanggungan, hipotek dan agunan kebendaan lainnya), adanya ketentuan penangguhan eksekusi dan pembatasan jangka waktu eksekusi jaminan dalam UU Kepailitan kurang selaras dengan ketentuan hukum jaminan, sehingga berpotensi merugikan kreditur separatis. Dalam pembahasan tulisan ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa perlu dilakukan suatu penyesuaian baik melalui revisi undang-undang maupun dengan Peraturan Pemerintah, sehingga dapat memberikan kepastian hukum mengenai ada atau tidak adanya hak eksekusi kreditur separatis.
Kegiatan Yayasan Setelah Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2001 tentang Yayasan di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Mr. Sularto
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 21, No 1 (2009)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (355.933 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16258

Abstract

This research is meant to examine the foundations activities, especially the ones concerning with the implementation of the adjustment of the foundation’s statutes and their constraints as well as their entries which are in accordance with the aims and purposes of the foundations as written in the statutes. The answers of the problems were taken from the library and field research. The library research was done by perusing primary, secondary, and tertiary law materials with documents as their instruments. The field research was conducted by distributing questionnaire to the staff of the foundations and interviewing Notaries as the resource persons. After the research was done and conclusion was taken, it was founded that; the adjustment of the statutes of foundations has only been implemented by 27% of the respondents. The constraints of the adjustments of statutes of the foundations include the internal constraints, covering: the poor understanding upon the statutes, financial matters, the reluctance of the committee to the adjustments they should make, and the external constraints, which include the incomplete regulations, and the poor support from the involved parties. The foundations which establish Universities and Hospitals, or which hold Art Performing do not comply with Article 3 about foundation; whereas Foundations which run enterprises as indicated by Chapter 3 jo. Chapter 8 of the statutes of the foundations does not exceed 33.33 %.