Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik Unisia JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)
Maria S.W. Sumardjono
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Yuridis Kepres No. 55 Tahun 1993 Tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum dan Pelaksanaannya Sumardjono, Maria S.W.
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 1996: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1996
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik (MAP) FISIPOL Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (229.453 KB)

Abstract

Necessity will make available land for developmcw, offering the opportunity for the transfer of for several projects. whether for state of public requirements, or for business necessity tfar that matter. in either a small or a large scale. Because the slate owned land is no longer satisfactoo, in supply. it is desirable that these various necessities for land, which in a way. are objects for the need for the right to prossess land. whether it as individuals or by a legal body, or by the legal community radar) be there. Regulating or controlling this aspect is not that easy. This is because there often en:curs a discrepancy between das sullen and das rein. This writing will attempt to analyze the implementation of the kepres No. 55 of 1993 whose operationalization was supported by the ministerial regulation Agrarian/Head of BPN No. 1 of 1994, by revising what was meant by public importance. how its deliberation should be executed in the process of-freeing land, how the loss should be shared, how the prcession of the transferred land should be in the hands of the legal community (adat). From the results of the analysis. it is concluded that the concept of public importance, the discussion and sharing the loss, all eAperience a shift. With the validity of the kepres discussed above, it is apparent that it is only government which has the right to use the land meant for public importance for other development activities.
Tinjauan Yuridis Kepres No. 55 Tahun 1993 Tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum dan Pelaksanaannya Maria S.W. Sumardjono
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 1996: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1996
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (229.453 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.8536

Abstract

Necessity will make available land for developmcw, offering the opportunity for the transfer of for several projects. whether for state of public requirements, or for business necessity tfar that matter. in either a small or a large scale. Because the slate owned land is no longer satisfactoo, in supply. it is desirable that these various necessities for land, which in a way. are objects for the need for the right to prossess land. whether it as individuals or by a legal body, or by the legal community radar) be there. Regulating or controlling this aspect is not that easy. This is because there often en:curs a discrepancy between das sullen and das rein. This writing will attempt to analyze the implementation of the kepres No. 55 of 1993 whose operationalization was supported by the ministerial regulation Agrarian/Head of BPN No. 1 of 1994, by revising what was meant by public importance. how its deliberation should be executed in the process of-freeing land, how the loss should be shared, how the prcession of the transferred land should be in the hands of the legal community (adat). From the results of the analysis. it is concluded that the concept of public importance, the discussion and sharing the loss, all eAperience a shift. With the validity of the kepres discussed above, it is apparent that it is only government which has the right to use the land meant for public importance for other development activities.
Pendaftaran Hak Tanggungan Maria S.W. Sumardjono
Unisia No. 17: Tahun XIII Triwulan VI 1993
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/unisia.v0i17.5319

Abstract

-
Tinjauan Yuridis Kepres No. 55 Tahun 1993 Tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum dan Pelaksanaannya Maria S.W. Sumardjono
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 1, No 1 (1996): May
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.8536

Abstract

Necessity will make available land for developmcw, offering the opportunity for the transfer of for several projects. whether for state of public requirements, or for business necessity tfar that matter. in either a small or a large scale. Because the slate owned land is no longer satisfactoo, in supply. it is desirable that these various necessities for land, which in a way. are objects for the need for the right to prossess land. whether it as individuals or by a legal body, or by the legal community radar) be there. Regulating or controlling this aspect is not that easy. This is because there often en:curs a discrepancy between das sullen and das rein. This writing will attempt to analyze the implementation of the kepres No. 55 of 1993 whose operationalization was supported by the ministerial regulation Agrarian/Head of BPN No. 1 of 1994, by revising what was meant by public importance. how its deliberation should be executed in the process of-freeing land, how the loss should be shared, how the prcession of the transferred land should be in the hands of the legal community (adat). From the results of the analysis. it is concluded that the concept of public importance, the discussion and sharing the loss, all eAperience a shift. With the validity of the kepres discussed above, it is apparent that it is only government which has the right to use the land meant for public importance for other development activities.
Co-Authors