Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Hak Digital Lansia sebagai Pelaku Begging Digital di Live Video TikTok Fatohu Jonathan Marunduri; Ai Permanasari
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 12 (2025): Tema Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i12.2115

Abstract

The act of Digital begging or online begging carried out by elderly people in live videos on the TikTok platform has sparked controversy, raising the question of whether the elderly have digital rights that must be protected, as such activities have the potential to cause negative impacts. This study aims to answer two main questions: (1) how can the digital rights of the elderly be understood in the context of their role as perpetrators of digital begging on TikTok, (2) what is TikTok's responsibility in providing digital rights to the elderly as perpetrators of digital begging on TikTok live videos, and (3) how can the law provide protection for the digital rights of the elderly Using a normative juridical approach, this study examines relevant legal rules and norms such as Law Number 14 of 1998 concerning the Welfare of the Elderly, Law -Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights, as well as international regulations such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and draws on best practices from other countries. The results of the study show that the elderly are permanent legal subjects who have digital rights, including as perpetrators of digital begging on live TikTok videos, and in this case, Indonesia has a legal vacuum regarding the digital rights of the elderly. Therefore, regulatory updates are needed that explicitly regulate the digital rights of the elderly, either through the revision of Law Number 14 of 1998 concerning Elderly Welfare or integration into Law - Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions and Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection.
AKSES MENDAPATKAN KEADILAN (ACCESS TO JUSTICE): HAK KONSUMEN ATAS ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DI LUAR PENGADIALN Ai Permanasari
Dialogia Iuridica Vol. 10 No. 2 (2019): Volume 10 Nomor 2 April 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Maranatha Christian University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28932/di.v10i2.1532

Abstract

Access to justice is a mechanism for every person, whose rights are violated, including consumers who are in dispute, to find effective solutions provided by the justice system. The mechanism shouldt be accessible, affordable and easy to understand. This mechanism must be able to provide justice fairly, speedy and without discrimination, and must also provide an alternative dispute resolution. In the case of consumer alternative dispute resolution outside the court, it should provide a great benefit to the community, because the avaibility of the choice to access justice in a way that can be adapted to their needs and abilities. But what is the meaning of the alternative or choice if in the end it cannot be implemented or cannot be executed to what has become decision or agreement of the alternative institution. This is related to the contradiction of the strength of BPSK decisions, in order there are still legal remedies against the BPSK decision, and the execution of the BPSK verdict still relies on the existence of 'fiat' executions from the court. Therefore to ensure access to justice for the consumers, harmonization between courts and consumer alternative disputes resolution system is unavoidable.
Urgensi Mekanisme Khusus dalam Penanganan Pelecehan Seksual di Transportasi Umum Shaffira Aura Khanza; Ai Permanasari
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i1.10338

Abstract

Sexual harassment on public transportation is a form of gender-based violence that remains prevalent in Indonesia. Although various regulations exist, such as Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning Criminal Acts of Sexual Violence, their implementation remains ineffective in providing protection and a sense of security for victims, particularly women. This study aims to analyze the mechanisms for handling sexual harassment on public transportation, identify the obstacles faced, and formulate solutions to strengthen legal protection for victims. The research method used is normative juridical, with a legislative and conceptual approach. Data were obtained through a literature review of laws and regulations, academic literature, and actual cases such as the harassment case on the Commuter Line (KRL) and Tanah Abang Station. The results show that the handling of sexual harassment cases on public transportation is suboptimal due to the absence of standardized SOPs, lack of coordination between agencies, and minimal officer sensitivity to victims. Furthermore, social stigma and patriarchal culture remain major barriers for victims to report. This study recommends the establishment of a comprehensive legal mechanism, including the development of integrated standard operating procedures (SOPs), the establishment of rapid response units in public transportation, regular training for officers, and strengthening a secure reporting system. This is expected to create a safe, equal, and sexual violence-free public space.
Penerapan Right To Be Forgotten dalam Melindungi Identitas Anak sebagai Pelaku maupun Korban pada Konten Kekerasan dan Seksual di Platform Media Sosial Vina Yunita; Ai Permanasari
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i1.10500

Abstract

The spread of content depicting children as perpetrators or victims of violence on social media platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, and X raises serious issues related to privacy and digital footprints. The Right to Be Forgotten (RTBF) provides children or guardians with the right to delete detrimental personal data as an effort to restore their digital identity and privacy. This study uses normative juridical methods and a conceptual approach to analyze the Indonesian legal framework of the ITE Law, the PDP Law, and the Child Protection Law and compares them with best practices in the European Union, Australia, and France. The results show that RTBF in Indonesia has a clear legal basis, but its implementation remains limited due to slow platform response, lengthy court procedures, the absence of an independent oversight body, and the rapid spread of content. This study emphasizes the need for a non-litigation deletion mechanism, a strong oversight body, and the application of the best interest of the child principle to ensure comprehensive protection of children's identities in the digital realm. With strengthened regulations and public awareness, RTBF can be an effective instrument in preventing stigmatization and supporting children's social rehabilitation.