Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.882
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Adi Widya : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Waluyo Slamet Pradoto
Unknown Affiliation
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
PENYEBARLUASKAN PENGETAHUAN HUKUM UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KESADARAN HUKUM MASYARAKAT Waluyo Slamet Pradoto; Agatha Jumiati; Denny Risnandhi; Yunio Adi Prasetyo
Adi Widya : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol 4 No 2 (2020): ADIWIDYA
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33061/awpm.v4i2.4391

Abstract

Legal knowledge is very necessary for the creation of legal understanding and awareness of legal awareness for the community. There are several factors that can affect public legal awareness. This community service is expected to provide knowledge and understanding to the community, especially students. With knowledge and understanding of the prevailing legal rules, they will maintain their legal awareness to a higher level.
Legal Review and Democratic Challenges of Community Organizations in Indonesia Waluyo Slamet Pradoto; Santoso Budi Nursal Umar
Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): September
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/ijlj.v3i1.4774

Abstract

This research discusses the phenomenon of social organizations (ormas) in Indonesia from a legal perspective and the challenges of democracy. The freedom of association guarantyd by Article 28E paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution serves as the legal basis for the existence of social organizations, which are further regulated by Law Number 17 of 2013 and Law Number 16 of 2017. Regulatory changes, particularly the government's authority to dissolve mass organizations without judicial process, have sparked a debate between the need to maintain public order and the guaranty of the principle of due process of law. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative and conceptual approach, supported by a literature study from primary and secondary legal materials. The study results show that although mass organizations have great potential in strengthening democracy, challenges such as identity politics, radicalism, lack of funding transparency, and state power abuse against mass organizations still pose major obstacles. Therefore, balanced legal regulations, transparent oversight, and enhanced democratic literacy are needed to ensure that the role of social organizations remains in line with the principles of the rule of law and Pancasila democracy
Legal Review and Democratic Challenges of Community Organizations in Indonesia Waluyo Slamet Pradoto; Santoso Budi Nursal Umar
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): September : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i3.2411

Abstract

This research discusses the phenomenon of social organizations (ormas) in Indonesia from a legal perspective and the challenges of democracy. The freedom of association guarantyd by Article 28E paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution serves as the legal basis for the existence of social organizations, which are further regulated by Law Number 17 of 2013 and Law Number 16 of 2017. Regulatory changes, particularly the government's authority to dissolve mass organizations without judicial process, have sparked a debate between the need to maintain public order and the guaranty of the principle of due process of law. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative and conceptual approach, supported by a literature study from primary and secondary legal materials. The study results show that although mass organizations have great potential in strengthening democracy, challenges such as identity politics, radicalism, lack of funding transparency, and state power abuse against mass organizations still pose major obstacles. Therefore, balanced legal regulations, transparent oversight, and enhanced democratic literacy are needed to ensure that the role of social organizations remains in line with the principles of the rule of law and Pancasila democracy.  
Authority of The Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission Post Amendment to Law No. 19 of 2019: Regresive or Progressive in Law Enforcement? Laksito, Fransiscus Xaverius Hastowo Broto; Rian Saputra; Doris Rahmat; Waluyo Slamet Pradoto; Aji Bawono; Kesya Zhalibina Sunarto
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.5334

Abstract

The aim of this research is to look at the transformation of the Corruption Eradication Commission Institution after the revision of the new Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) Law in supporting corruption prevention policies in Indonesia. This research was conducted using doctrinal legal research methods or normative legal research. In this research, the approaches used include: Statute Approach. Conceptual Approach, Historical Approach, Case Approach. The research results show that: 1) The authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) after the promulgation of Law no. 19 of 2019 concerning the Second Amendment to Law no. 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, with the addition of the Supervisory Board within the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK)  Institution which has quite large authority, namely not only supervision but also the implementation of the authority of the Corruption Eradication Committee, namely that it must first obtain permission from the Supervisory Board before carrying out wiretapping, searches and/ or the confiscation is carried out by the Corruption Eradication Commission, this can hinder law enforcement in eradicating criminal acts of corruption and can also affect the independence of the Eradication of Corruption Crimes within the Corruption Eradication Commission Institution.
Analysis and Legal Implications of the Constitutional Court's Decision on the Determination of the Age Limit for Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates Santoso Budi Nursal Umar; Waluyo Slamet Pradoto
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): September : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i3.2444

Abstract

This research discusses the Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 regarding the minimum age requirement for presidential and vice-presidential candidates as stipulated in Article 169 letter q of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. In that decision, the Constitutional Court ruled that the age limit of 40 years remains in effect, but with an exception for candidates who are not yet 40 years old but have previously or are currently serving as regional heads. This research employs a normative juridical method with legislative and conceptual approaches, analyzing primary legal materials such as the 1945 Constitution, Election Law, and Constitutional Court decisions, supported by secondary legal materials from academic literature and journals. The research findings indicate that the Constitutional Court's considerations are based on the principles of citizens' constitutional rights, open legal policy, and the idea of leadership experience as an alternative age requirement. This decision has positive implications, including opportunities for leadership regeneration and increased political participation by young people, but it also draws criticism for its potential to discriminate against non-regional leaders and create political suspicion. Therefore, a revision of the Election Law is needed to clarify the legal norms resulting from the Constitutional Court's decision so that it does not lead to multiple interpretations and maintains the principle of equality. This research concludes that the Constitutional Court's decision is an opportunity to strengthen democracy, but also a challenge in ensuring constitutional justice in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Agatha Jumiati Aji Bawono Denny Risnandhi FX Hastowo Broto Laksito Kesya Zhalibina Sunarto Rahmat, Doris rian saputra Santoso Budi Nursal Umar Yunio Adi Prasetyo