Ngatijo Ngatijo
Jambi University, Jambi 36361, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Development of electronic student worksheets based on toulmin argumentation patterns to improve argumentation skills in basic acid materials Esa Witri; Ngatijo Ngatijo; Muhammad Haris Effendi-Hasibuan
Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia (JPKim) Vol 12, No 3 (2020): December
Publisher : Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (376.476 KB) | DOI: 10.24114/jpkim.v12i3.21160

Abstract

This research is part of a research project to help improve students' argumentative skills in chemistry subjects. This research is part of the development of argumentation-based teaching materials while other studies have developed learning models, teaching materials and a collection of argumentation questions. The purpose of this research was to determine the process of developing students' e-worksheets, the feasibility of students' e-worksheets based on concept and practitioner perceptions, and the effectiveness of students' e-worksheets that were developed as teaching materials based on the Toulmin argumentation pattern. Product trials were conducted at state senior high schools 11 Jambi City. The results of the practitioner's eligibility based on the teacher's response are in the very good category and students from both groups have a correlation in the "high" category. The effectiveness test is seen from the average N-Gain score of the experimental class in the quite effective category. There is a significant difference between the experimental class and the control class which can be seen from the difference in learning outcomes of the experimental class (using students' e-LKS based on the Toulmin argumentation pattern) higher than the control class (not using e-LKS).Keywords: Acid-base, E-student worksheet, Toulmin's argumentation pattern
The effectiveness of modified flip-based argumentation learning in improving students’ argumentation skills about hydrocarbon Agustiningsih Agustiningsih; Ngatijo Ngatijo; Muhammad Haris Effendi-Hasibuan
Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia (JPKim) Vol 13, No 3 (2021): December
Publisher : Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (394.995 KB) | DOI: 10.24114/jpkim.v13i3.29930

Abstract

The FBAL learning model is a learning model that has a specific purpose to improve students’ argumentation skills by integrating Toulmin's argumentation pattern. This study aimed to see the effectiveness of the Modified Flip-Based Argumentation Learning in improving students' argumentation skills about the concept of hydrocarbon compounds. The effectiveness was examined by comparing this model to Flip-Based Argumentation Learning and Flipped Classroom model. The factors that influence the differences in students’ argumentation skills amongst the three classes were also investigated. Concurrent embedded mix method design was used in this study. Some 93 students of 11 grade of SMA Negeri 1 Merangin Jambi were participated in this study. Data were collected using argumentation test (pre-test and post-test) and observations. The results showed that there was no difference between the Modified FBAL and FBAL in improving the students’ argumentation skills but both were different from the Flipped Classroom. The N-gain was 0.80 and 0.81 respectively for the Modified FBAL and FBAL. However, those were higher than the N-Gain of Flipped Classroom which was 0.71. Difference in providing the students with opportunities to practice their argumentation skills amongst the three models was the major factors influencing the students' argumentation skills in the three classes.  Keywords: argumentation skills, flip based argumentation learning, modified FBAL, flipped classroom, hydrocarbon compounds