Jasmaniar Jasmaniar
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Batas Usia Kawin Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Permohonan Dispensasi Kawin Di Pengadilan Agama Jasmaniar Jasmaniar; Muh. Zulkifli Muhdar
Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law
Publisher : ILIN Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Research objective to analyze the provisions governing the age limit for marriage and the judge's considerations in granting and refusing the application for dispensation for marriage. This research is a normative research with a case approach that uses the types and sources of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The results show that setting the age limit for marriage based on the provisions of Article 7 Paragraph Law No. 16 of 2019 concerning amendments to Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning marriage is 19 years for the two prospective brides is an effort to prevent child marriage and provide legal protection for children, but the legal structure in this case the judge and the legal culture of the community also play a role in underage marriage which has an impact on increasing applications for dispensation for marriage in court. The judge's consideration of the determination of No. 0150/ Pdt.P/2021 PA.Pkj and No. 0059/Pdt.P/2021/PA.Pkj has prioritized the value of benefit because it considers economic and health aspects for the prospective bride and groom. Penelitian bertujuan menganalisis ketentuan yang mengatur batas usia kawin dan pertimbangan hakim dalam mengabulkan dan menolak permohonan dispensasi kawin. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan kasus yang menggunakan jenis dan sumber bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan batas usia kawin berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 7 Ayat Undang-Undang No 16 tahun 2019 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang No 1 Tahun 1974 tentang perkawinan adalah 19 tahun bagi kedua calon mempelai merupakan suatu upaya untuk mencegah terjadinya perkawinan terhadap anak dan memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap anak, namun struktur hukum dalam hal ini hakim dan budaya hukum masyarakat turut berperan terhadap perkawinan di bawah umur yang berdampak pada meningkatnya permohonan dispensasi kawin di pengadilan. Pertimbangan hakim terhadap penetapan No 0150/ Pdt.P/2021 PA.Pkj dan No 0059/ Pdt.P/2021/PA.Pkj telah mengutamakan nilai kemanfaatan karena mempertimbangan aspek ekonomi dan kesehatan bagi calon mempelai..
Hak Masyarakat Adat: Studi Perbandingan Deklarasi PBB Tentang Hak-Hak Masyarakat Adat Dan Pasal 18 B Ayat 2 UUD NRI Tahun 1945 Muh Zulkifli Muhdar; Jasmaniar Jasmaniar
Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law
Publisher : ILIN Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study attempts to analyze and explain the rights of the community custom in the un declaration on the rights of the community customs and in article 2 paragraph 18 b UUD NRI 1945 year constitution. The research is normative, research the research done by means of the materials laws relating to the proposed in this research. The result of this research is the un declaration regarding the rights and article indigenous 18 b verse 2 constitution years 1945 having a difference in the use of certain groups of the indigenous.The rights of the custom in the united nations declaration can only be made if in the constitution nri years 1945 also regulates indigenous community. adat law is not Need to let the government of the republic of indonesia formulate convention to include the perception of indigenous people and the customary law the. That can use indigenous as. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan menjelaskan perbandingan hak masyarakat adat dalam deklarasi PBB tentang hak masyarakat adat dan dalam pasal 18 b ayat 2 UUD NRI Tahun 1945. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian Normatif, yaitu penelitian yang dilakukan dengan cara pengumpulan bahan-bahan hukum yang berkaitan dengan masalah yang diajukan dalam penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian ini adalah Deklarasi PBB Tentang Hak Masyarakat Adat Dan Pasal 18 B Ayat 2 UUD NRI Tahun 1945 memiliki perbedaan dalam hal penggunakan peristilahan terhadap kesatuan kelompok tertentu yaitu masyarakat adat. Hak-hak masyarakat adat dalam Deklarasi PBB hanya dapat dituangkan jika dalam UUD NRI Tahun 1945 juga mengatur tentang masyarakat adat bukan masyarakat hukum adat. Perlu kiranya pemerintah Republik Indonesia merumuskan konvensi ketatanegaraan dengan mencantumkan persamaan persepsi antara masyarakat adat dan masyarakat hukum adat tersebut. Kiranya dapat menggunakan peristilah masyarakat adat sebagai yang dicantumkan dalam Deklarasi PBB.
Value of Evidence of Arguments Via Whatsapp in Divorce Cases in Court Hasbuddin Khalid; Jasmaniar Jasmaniar; Andika Prawira Buana
Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam Vol 8, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam IAIN Bone

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30863/ajmpi.v8i2.4376

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the value of evidence of quarrels through the whatsapp application in divorce proceedings in court. This research is normative research with a statutory approach. Types and sources of legal materials are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the research that quarrels carried out through the WhatsApp application can be submitted as evidence at trial, however, the value of evidence is not perfect and binding so that other evidence is needed to prove disputes and quarrels that occur continuously as a cause of divorce
Mediasi Elektronik Sebagai Perwujudan Asas Peradilan Cepat, Sederhana, dan Biaya Ringan Jasmaniar Jasmaniar; Hasbuddin Khalid
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1369

Abstract

This paper analyzes the problem of electronic mediation as a manifestation of the principles of fast, simple and low-cost justice. The main problem in researching the essence of the principle of fast, simple, low-cost justice through electronic trials and the beneficial value of mediation carried out electronically. This research is normative juridical research with primary and secondary legal materials analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The essence of the principle of fast, simple and low-cost justice is legal certainty for the parties involved in the case without prejudice to the value of justice and benefit, while the value of the benefit of electronic mediation is the ease in resolving disputes, the relatively short time compared to settlement by judge's decision, and the costs involved. affordable.