Adrian Lubis
Kementerian Perdagangan

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

DAYA SAING, KINERJA PERDAGANGAN, DAN DAMPAK LIBERALISASI PRODUK KEHUTANAN Adrian Lubis
Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan Vol 7 No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Trade Analysis and Development Agency, Ministry of Trade of Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (432.755 KB) | DOI: 10.30908/bilp.v7i1.99

Abstract

Produk kehutanan Indonesia telah diliberalisasi sejak tahun 2007, namun kinerja perdagangannya belum membaik. Hal ini terlihat dari 127 pos tarif produk yang dibina Kementerian Kehutanan, hanya 34 pos tarif yang mengalami surplus perdagangan, 62 pos tarif mengalami defisit. Sebanyak 13 pos tarif dari 62 pos tarif yang defisit merupakan bahan baku yang banyak digunakan oleh industri kehutanan nasional. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan Indeks Intra-Industry Trade dan Indeks Spesialisasi Perdagangan, serta hasil simulasi yang menggunakan GTAP GMig2, produk kehutanan yang memiliki daya saing tinggi adalah Pulp of Wood, jauh diatas daya saing produk Paper and Paper Board serta Woods and Article of Wood. Keterbatasan bahan baku menjadi penyebab utama gagalnya Indonesia untuk memanfaatkan liberalisasi perdagangan. Sebanyak 34 pos tarif yang surplus semenjak liberalisasi sebaiknya tetap diliberalisasi dan dijadikan produk ekspor utama. Adapun 13 pos tarif yang menjadi bahan baku utama industri nasional, meskipun mengalami defisit, sebaiknya tetap diliberalisasi. Sebanyak 49 pos tarif yang defisit dan tidak menjadi bahan baku utama sebaiknya diberlakukan trade remedies dan dijadikan produk sensitif. Since 2007 the forestry product has been liberalized, but its trading performance has not improved yet. From 127 product tariff lines fostered by the Ministry of Forestry, there are only 34 lines which gained trade surplus and 62 lines which experienced trade deficit. Out of 62 products tariff lines which experienced trade deficit, 13 products are raw materials which are widely used by forest industry. Based on the Intra-Industry Trade and Trade Specialization Indexes, as well as simulation results using the GTAP GMig 2, forestry product with high competitiveness is Pulp of Wood, far above the competitiveness of Paper and Paper Board and Woods and Articles of Wood. The limited availability of raw materials is the main cause of Indonesia’s failure to take advantage of trade liberalization. The 34 product tariff lines which experienced surpluses should remain liberalized and become the main export products. Although experiencing deficits, the 13 product tariff lines which are the main raw materials for the industrial sector should be continually liberalized, while the remaining 49 product tariff lines which are not key raw materials should be provided with trade remedies and they should be considered as sensitive products.
FASILITAS BEBAS BEA MASUK BAGI LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES DAN MANFAATNYA BAGI INDONESIA Adrian Lubis
Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan Vol 7 No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Trade Analysis and Development Agency, Ministry of Trade of Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (513.888 KB) | DOI: 10.30908/bilp.v7i2.114

Abstract

Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji manfaat pemberian fasilitas bebas bea masuk bagi negara penerima yang dikelompokkan ke dalam LDC dan manfaatnya bagi Indonesia sebagai negara pemberi. Metode yang digunakan adalah Indeks Spesialisasi Perdagangan, Indeks Intra Industry Trade, Uji Beda dan Model Keseimbangan Umum GTAP. Hasil analisis yang diperoleh menunjukkan bahwa fasilitas bantuan akses pasar tersebut tidak merugikan industri nasional dan merupakan sumber alternatif untuk memperoleh bahan baku. Hal tersebut akan semakin kuat jika Indonesia memanfaatkan fleksibilitas sebagai negara berkembang yang tidak diwajibkan untuk menghapus bea masuk seluruh pos tarif yang dikenakan kepada negara-negara LDC. Namun, dalam pelaksanaannya fasilitasi tersebut harus diikuti dengan pemberlakuan surat keterangan asal yang ketat untuk meminimalkan kemungkinan penyelundupan dari negara bukan anggota LDC. This study is conducted to investigate the benefits of the duty-free facility for the Least Developed Countries (LDC) as receivers and the benefits for Indonesia as a donor. The methods of analysis used in this study are Trade Specialization Index, Index of Intra Industry Trade, Differential Test and General Equilibrium Model of GTAP. The study found that the duty-free facility is not detrimental to the national industry and as an alternative source of obtaining raw materials. It will be stronger if Indonesia utilizing the flexibility as developing country with no obligation to remove all import duties charged to LDC countries. However, in practice, such kind of facilitation should be followed by the application of strict certificate of origin to minimize the possibility of smuggling from countries other than the members of the LDC.