<![CDATA[Presently, Indonesia has a tendency to execute over-criminalization. One of which is in the settlement of legal cases over Law Number 19 of 2016 on Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE Law) which prioritizes criminal sanctions. Whereas in its content, the Law provides administrative sanctions, so that the ultimum remidium must be carried out by law enforcement officials. The author formulates two problems, namely first, what is the restotative justice model at the level of investigation, prosecution, and trial?; second, how is the reconceptualization of the application of restorative justice to the perpetrators and victims of the ITE Law? The research method used is a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approaches and uses secondary data sources, in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of this study conclude that first, at the level of restorative justice through material and formal investigations, the level of prosecution through the peaceful means and efforts by paying attention to the court supporting devices. Second, while at the trial level through law enforcement officers who are able to sort out and support efforts on restorative justice to produce a fair legal decisions. Second, reconceptualization of restorative justice in law enforcement of the ITE Law is through concepts of moro, dats and virtual justice.Key Words: Criminalization; ITE law; restorative justiceAbstrakDewasa ini, Indonesia mengalami kecenderungan over kriminalisasi. Salah satunya terdapat dalam penyelesaian kasus hukum atas Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) yang lebih mengedepankan sanksi pidana. Padahal dalam muatannya, UU ini mengandung sanksi administratif, sehingga ultimum remidium harus dilakukan oleh aparat penegak hukum. Penulis merumuskan dua masalah, yaitu pertama, bagaimanakah model restotative justice pada tingkat penyidikan, penuntutan, dan pengadilan?; kedua, bagaimanakah rekonseptualisasi terhadap penerapan restorative justice pada pelaku dan korban tindak pidana UU ITE?. Metode penelian yang digunakan adalah metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual serta menggunakan sumber data sekunder, berupa bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Hasil dari penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pertama, di tingkat penyidikan restorative justice melalui materiil dan formil, tingkat penuntutan melalui proses dan upaya perdamaian dengan memperhatikan perangkat pendukung sidang. Kedua, tingkat pengadilan melalui aparat penegak hukum yang dapat memilah dan mendukung dalam upaya restorative justice, sehingga menghasilkan putusan hukum yang berkeadilan. Kedua, rekonseptual restorative justice dalam penegakan hukum UU ITE melalui moro konsep, dats konsep, dan virtual justice consept.Kata Kunci: Pemidanaan; UU ITE; restorative justice]]>
