Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Budaya Nusantara
Primadi Tabrani
Bumi Limas Foundation/Faculty of Visual Art and Design – Head of Visual Language Reseach Group – Institut Teknologi Bandung – Indonesia
Arts Humanities Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
CADIK SAMUDRA BOROBUDUR : Jenius Lokal Nusantara Tabrani, Primadi
Jurnal Budaya Nusantara Vol 1 No 1 (2014): BUDAYA ADILUHUNG
Publisher : LPPM Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36456/b.nusantara.vol1.no1.a284

Abstract

Dugout canoe is from prehistory. It develops to become outrigger canoe: catamaran, one out- rigger and two outrigger. Then it is equipped with sails. After that came the plank built outrigger. There are still many mystery about the development of dugout canoeinto plank built outrigger. When and where does it appear? What about its dispersal so that outrigger canoe is every where in Austronesia? The ocean outrigger vessel as seen in the Borobudur relief, is a Nusantara local jenius. It is for voyages between islands, trading, passenger, war, even ocean liner. With this kind of ship Sriwijaya and Majapahit became great maritime kingdom, not only in South East Asia, but also in Asia and in the world as well.With this kind of ship, Nusantara are able to wander to the Pacific, the Indian and the Atlantic, all three Ocean in the world. At those times, Nusantara is the only people that are able to do that.
INFO INFO YANG MENDEBARKAN: Punden Berundak, Toba Purba, Banjir Besar, Wawasan Nusantara, Gunung Padang Tabrani, Primadi
Jurnal Budaya Nusantara Vol 1 No 2 (2014): BUDAYA ADI LUHUNG
Publisher : LPPM Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36456/b.nusantara.vol1.no2.a410

Abstract

This article is not yet a real research; it is more as a deep reflection. But those deep reflections are worth to be researched thoroughly by experts from many fields of study integratingly. Thinking of people in land-continent with many countries as Europe is different then thinking of people in one country as Indonesia, a maritime-continent. In land-continents thinking, sea is to separte, in maritime-continent Indonesia with its islands, sea is to unite, wawasan Nusantara as old as prehistory. Each countryin a land-continent are eager to differentiate and defend to other countries by ethnic, language, religion, ideology, while in Indonsia as a maritime-continent, we is one country, several parts are slightly different but we are “one”: “Bhinneka Tunggal Ika”. In land-continent countries, a city with walls fortification, a country with great walls fortification are usual. While it is not so in Maritime-continent Indonesia, as is Trowulan the capital of the great empire Majapahit. Our school books says that the population of Indonesia comes from Asia, 5000 BC and 2000BC, while it is known that the migration of homosapiens has reach West Nusantara about 60 – 80.000 BC, and experienced the ancient Toba Mountain great explosion and the three great floods.The west theory said that Indonesia is a country between two continents and two aceans, where culture, etnic, nation, religion, etc, criss cross ofer it. So Indonesia ’has nothing’. No local genius. Nusantara people cruises the Pacific and Indian ocean before Christ, the Atlantic in the first century. What about ”Atlantis” and ”Eden in the East” situated in Sundaland, that alter the world culture, history & development? Has all this a connection with the mistery of Gunung Padang? Keywords: Land-continent thinking, Maritime-continent thinking, Wawasan Nusantara, BhinnekaTunggal Ika, Gunung Padang.
PRINSIP-PRINSIP BAHASA RUPA Tabrani, Primadi
Jurnal Budaya Nusantara Vol 1 No 2 (2018): NUSANTARA & KONTEMPORER
Publisher : LPPM Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36456/b.nusantara.vol1.no2.a1579

Abstract

The concept of Fine Language is the result of the creation of a long research, originally in the form of a researchreport on the science of Fine Language which later developed into dissertation research as much and as thick as 'onecoffin' (58x33x37cm). This Fine Language is a way of 'reading' pictures, from various images, pictures of children,prehistoric cave pictures, wayang beber pictures, then to symbolic images, decorative images and shadow images fromshadow puppets (wayang kulit). Also included are temple relief images and modern drawings, animated images, filmsand pictures produced by other digital technologies, such as ad images. The word language is different from the imagelanguage. In the image language, we can already describe the shape of the drawn. In the word language, use the word torepresent an object that is drawn. Often experience miscommunication because with various words (from different regions/tribes/countries) to describe an object. In the language of the image there are wimbas, in the wimba there is thecontent of wimba and way of wimba. The content of the wimba is a picture contained in the wimba, and the way thewimba is how the wimba is drawn and can be told. Through the 'science' is the original image that is beginning to beunderstood and retold as teaching materials or materials of scientific art for future studies, about the image of traditionsand modern drawings.
Co-Authors