Hilton Tarnama Putra M
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

China Responsibility in Case of Covid 19 Pandemic Under International Law Hilton Tarnama Putra M; Jarkasi Anwar
Nurani Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 Desember 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/nhk.v4i2.12628

Abstract

Pandemic COVID-19 was start from Wuhan, China then spread to the rest of the world. Under international law of public health, states have obligations to cooperate in tackling international health emergency. WHO Constitution and IHR confirms those obligations in which state denied its will arise state responsibility. The purpose of this research is to elaborate state obligations under international law to handle COVID-19 and particularly to China. This research use normative legal research method which means to analysis international law norm in practice. The results of this research are, first there are several obligations to state in handle COVID-19 such as to cooperate, to notify WHO and to made domestic regulation. Second, China is not responsible for COVID-19 case because China did not breach any international obligations under international law.
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Plagiarisme Oleh Partai Politik Suatu Negara Berdasarkan TRIPs Agreement 1994 (Studi Kasus Plagiarisme Oleh Partai Nasional Selandia Baru) Dany Ardy Saputra; Hilton Tarnama Putra M; Mas Nana Jumena
Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir Vol. 1 No. 1 Agustus 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/yta.v1i1.11395

Abstract

TRIPs are one of the sources of International Law that is widely used by many countries in drafting international trade regulations. One of the things that is quite firmly regulated in TRIPs is the act of plagiarism. Today there have been many acts of plagiarism, no exception in the scope of the international community. Acts of plagiarism can also be done by anyone be it individuals, legal entities, or organization. One example of plagiarism violations occurring within the international copyright sphere is a case concerning New Zealand National Party with Eight Mile Style which is the publicist of international musician Eminem. Idetification of the problem in this study is how to set up acts of plagiarism by political parties according to TRIPs Agreement 1994 and how to solve cases acts of plagiarism by New Zealand National Party according to TRIPs Agreement 1994. This research method uses normative juridical methods that are qualitative. The research specifications used are analytical descriptive. Data collection techniques using literature study techniques and obtaining secondary data covering primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Data analysis using qualitative data analysis. The conclusion of this study is that in TRIPs Agreement 1994 not including a regulation on political parties. As a legal or regulatory subject regarding plagiarism committed by political parties in resolving cases between Eight Mile Style which are legal entities and as the licensee of the song “Lose Yourself” who are suing New Zealand National Party who used the song as part of one of the party's campaign ads, in resolving the case using New Zealand Copyright Act 1994, this is in accordance with the Article 61 TRIPs Agreement 1994 stating that member states must regulate criminal procedures and penalties to be applied.
INDONESIA'S REJECTION OF ISRAEL IN THE 2023 U-20 WORLD CUP: AN INTERNATIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVE Putra M, Hilton Tarnama; Fachriza, Afda; Susanti, Hera; RE, Pengleang
Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol 3, No 2 (2024): Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Vol. 3 No. 3 Edisi December 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/tjil.v3i2.29655

Abstract

Sport is a significant aspect of international relations. In 2023, FIFA planned to hold the U-20 World Cup in Indonesia, but the event was canceled after Indonesia rejected Israel's participation. This research aims to analyze whether a country has the authority to exclude other nations from sports events under international law, and whether Indonesia's actions in rejecting Israel's participation align with international legal principles. The study uses a normative legal research method, focusing on relevant legal norms and frameworks. The findings indicate that, according to international law, a state’s sovereignty allows it to make decisions regarding participation in international events, as outlined in the general principles of law and the 1933 Montevideo Convention. These principles affirm a nation's right to control its territory, including its policies on human rights, in line with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and FIFA's Statutes. Furthermore, the legal basis for Indonesia's rejection of Israel is supported by national laws, including the 1945 Constitution’s preamble and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Regulation No. 3 of 2019, which sets guidelines for Indonesia’s foreign relations, particularly with Israel. The contribution of science in this research is an analysis of the legality of state actions in the context of rejecting the participation of other countries in international sports events, by considering the principle of state sovereignty and international legal obligations