Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Justitia et Pax Dialogia Iuridica Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis
Anna Anindita Nur Pustika
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Parahyangan
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Arti Penting Mandatory Access Consular Notification dalam Hubungan Konsuler Anna Anindita Nur Pustika
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 3 No 1 (2022): Tema Hukum Internasional dan Perbandingan Hukum
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

One of the relationships that can be done between countries is through consular relations. Consular relations can be carried out if there is an agreement between the two parties which is then continued by sending representatives of his country to be placed in the receiving country. One of the obligations of the receiving state and the sending state is to provide protection of citizens who face legal problems in the receiving country. This is called the Mandatory Access Consular Notification, that the receiving state shall immediately notify the consular representative of the country of origin if there is a citizen of that country facing legal problems and the consular representative is obliged to provide assistance on the territory of the receiving State within the limits permitted by the law of the receiving State and international law.
Kehancuran Benda Cagar Budaya Saat Konflik Bersenjata: Eksistensi Blue Shield Emblem Mokhamad Gisa Vitrana; Anna Anindita Nur Pustika
Dialogia Iuridica Vol. 15 No. 1 (2023): Dialogia Iuridica Journal Vol. 15 No. 1 Year 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Maranatha Christian University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28932/di.v15i1.6586

Abstract

The intentional destruction of cultural heritage in armed conflict that is not used for military purposes causes the greatest losses of mankind. Lots of cultural properties have great value as the cultural heritage of mankind. Creating the distinctive emblem through the 1954 Hague Convention and its two Protocols d become a crucial way in terms of the protection of cultural properties. Based on these instruments, three categories of distinctive emblem gave for cultural properties over general, special and enhanced protection. It could impact cultural property under unnecessary damage when armed conflict occurred. Therefore, this research d a crucial basic issue on how form, function, and assignation of the distinctive emblem should be, based on the provisions of the 1954 Hague Convention and its two Protocols, as well as related International Humanitarian Law. As the result of this research, it can be said that the existence of a distinctive emblem is remained unclear in terms of its size form and assignation on cultural property. This research ed that the use of distinctive emblem shall be regulated by decisive provisions through a Convention or such a guideline of implementation so that distinctive emblem can be seen by the dispute parties to avoid unnecessary damage to cultural property.
PELANGGARAN PRINSIP-PRINSIP PIAGAM PBB 1945 DALAM SERANGAN MILITER RUSIA KE WILAYAH UKRAINA Pustika, Anna Anindita Nur Pustika; Angela Merici Vanessa S.A; Stephanie Liestia G
Justitia et Pax Vol. 39 No. 1 (2023): Justitia et Pax Volume 39 Nomor 1 Tahun 2023
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v39i1.7088

Abstract

In international law, an independent and sovereign state has an obligation to respect another state such as not intervening, respecting territorial integrity, and resolving international disputes peacefully. The conflict between Russia and Ukraine attracted world attention since 2014 when Russia annexed the territory of Crimea, Ukraine which made a referendum and resulted in Crimea joining Russia. In 2022, the relations between Russia and Ukraine had problem because Russia did military operations by detonating bombs on several cities in Ukraine. The action raised questions about how the general principles of international law works that every independent state should respect. This paper examines the conflict relations between Russia and Ukraine against the general principles of international law based on the 1945 UN Charter. This paper used qualitative research with normative juridical research methods. The result of this paper is that the military operation by Russia does not reflect the implementation and respect of Article 2 paragraph (4) and Article 2 paragraph (7) of the UN Charter regarding the prohibition of using armed violence and acting to intervene in other countries. Also, Russia's actions unfulfilled the self-defense criteria specified by Article 51 of the UN Charter.
PELANGGARAN PRINSIP-PRINSIP PIAGAM PBB 1945 DALAM SERANGAN MILITER RUSIA KE WILAYAH UKRAINA Pustika, Anna Anindita Nur Pustika; Angela Merici Vanessa S.A; Stephanie Liestia G
Justitia et Pax Vol. 39 No. 1 (2023): Justitia et Pax Volume 39 Nomor 1 Tahun 2023
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v39i1.7088

Abstract

In international law, an independent and sovereign state has an obligation to respect another state such as not intervening, respecting territorial integrity, and resolving international disputes peacefully. The conflict between Russia and Ukraine attracted world attention since 2014 when Russia annexed the territory of Crimea, Ukraine which made a referendum and resulted in Crimea joining Russia. In 2022, the relations between Russia and Ukraine had problem because Russia did military operations by detonating bombs on several cities in Ukraine. The action raised questions about how the general principles of international law works that every independent state should respect. This paper examines the conflict relations between Russia and Ukraine against the general principles of international law based on the 1945 UN Charter. This paper used qualitative research with normative juridical research methods. The result of this paper is that the military operation by Russia does not reflect the implementation and respect of Article 2 paragraph (4) and Article 2 paragraph (7) of the UN Charter regarding the prohibition of using armed violence and acting to intervene in other countries. Also, Russia's actions unfulfilled the self-defense criteria specified by Article 51 of the UN Charter.
Co-Authors Angela Merici Vanessa S.A Mokhamad Gisa Vitrana Stephanie Liestia G