Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.745
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal WAJAH HUKUM Jurnal Politik dan Pemerintahan Daerah RIO LAW JURNAL DATIN LAW JURNAL
Mario Agusta
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muara Bungo
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Pemberian Abolisi terhadap Terpidana Korupsi: Tinjauan Yuridis dan Dampaknya pada Integritas Penegakan Hukum (Studi Kasus Tom Lembong) M Nanda Setiawan; Chindi Oeliga Yensi Afita; Halida Zia; Mario Agusta
Wajah Hukum Vol 10, No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v10i1.2118

Abstract

This article analyzes the granting of abolision to corruption convicts through a case study of Tom Lembong, the former Minister of Trade who was sentenced to 4.5 years in prison and fined for a sugar import corruption case. The study employs a normative-juridical approach by analyzing legal regulations, court decisions, presidential decrees, as well as relevant legal literature and media articles. The main findings reveal that the granting of abolision has a constitutional basis under Article 14 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution and is implemented through formal procedures involving the President and the House of Representatives (DPR). However, the implementation of abolision in corruption cases raises ethical, political, and juridical dilemmas, particularly concerning substantive justice and the integrity of law enforcement. Abolision granted to corruption offenders risks weakening deterrent effects, reducing public trust in the criminal justice system, and creating opportunities for the executive branch to abuse power for short-term political purposes. This study recommends that the government and DPR formulate specific criteria for future abolision grants, tighten public oversight mechanisms, and uphold the values of justice and the supremacy of law in all abolision decisions.
Analisis Efektivitas Pasal 28 Ayat 2 UU ITE Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 dalam Perlindungan Korban Ujaran Kebencian Berbasis Sara di Media Sosial Chindi Oeliga Yensi Afita; M. Nanda Setiawan; Halida Zia; Mario Agusta; Lara Artifa Putry
Wajah Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v9i2.1941

Abstract

This study analyzes the effectiveness of Article 28 paragraph (2) of Law Number 1 Year 2024 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions (UU ITE) in providing legal protection for victims of hate speech based on ethnicity, religion, race, and inter-group relations (SARA) on social media. Hate speech on social media is increasingly widespread and has the potential to threaten national unity. Although the UU ITE regulation prohibits the dissemination of information that incites hatred based on SARA, its enforcement faces various obstacles such as ambiguous legal norms, low digital literacy, and evidentiary challenges. This study uses a normative juridical approach with case analyses of Meiliana, Jozeph Paul Zhang, and Ahmad Dhani as examples. The findings indicate that victim protection is still inadequate, and law enforcement is not fully effective and fair. Therefore, a collaborative strategy involving the government, law enforcement, social media platforms, and the public is needed to address the spread of hate speech more effectively and justly.
Co-Authors Chindi Oeliga Yensi Afita Chindy Oeliga Yensi Afita Cindy Oeliga Yensi Afita Desi Afriyanti Halida Zia Lara Artifa Putry M Nanda Setiawan Maryani Maryani Nirmala Sari Syafrinia Syafrinia