Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

The Existence of the Role of Indonesia National Central Bureau (NCB-INTERPOL) in Extradition Cooperation as an Effort to Eradicate the Transnational Crime Januari Nasya Ayu Taduri; Raden Muhammad Arvy Ilyasa; Rastini Rastini
Advances in Police Science Research Journal Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): January, Advances in Police Science Research Journal
Publisher : Indonesian National Police Academy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The end of this decade, transnational crime increased rapidly. Transnational crime greatly affects the defence, security, economy and social aspects of a country's society. In addition, transnational crime has caused anxiety around the world. Indonesia as a country that has a strategic geographic location and is often the target of transnational crime destinations, should make efforts to eradicate transnational crime. So far, Indonesia through NCB Interpol has made various efforts to overcome transnational crimes, such as cooperate with several other countries. This paper will discuss the role of the National Central Bureau (NCB) of Interpol Indonesia in extradition cooperation as the form of efforts to eradicate transnational crime. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the systematics and roles of extradition cooperation carried out by Indonesia and the destination country. This paper uses a normative legal research method based on several governing laws and regulations. It is hoped that this paper can provide a new understanding of extradition cooperation in handling transnational crimes against readers.
The Comparison Between Indonesia and The Netherlands Regarding Commercial Dispute Arbitration Christ Sella; Januari Nasya Ayu Taduri
Journal of Private and Commercial Law Vol 7, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jpcl.v7i1.30314

Abstract

In the dynamic realm of business, entrepreneurs continually encounter a multitude of risks and challenges that have the potential to lead to disputes among various parties involved. To effectively navigate such situations, businesspeople often prefer to adopt alternative dispute resolution methods, such as arbitration, rather than opting for traditional litigation. This preference is primarily motivated by a desire to protect and maintain the company's valuable reputation and goodwill. In Indonesia, the practice of arbitration dates back to the colonial era and is currently governed by The Act Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. In this paper, the author aims to conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of arbitration mechanisms in Indonesia and the Netherlands. The main objective is to assess the progress of arbitration in Indonesia in comparison to other countries and explore innovative arbitration mechanisms that can be implemented to further enhance the effectiveness of dispute resolution. To achieve this goal, the research methodology employed for this legal analysis is normative legal research with a comparative approach. By utilizing this approach, the study seeks to gain a deeper understanding of the existing arbitration practices in both Indonesia and the Netherlands, identify strengths and weaknesses, and propose potential areas for improvement. Overall, this study endeavors to shed light on the advancements made in the field of arbitration in Indonesia while drawing insights from international practices. By exploring and adopting novel arbitration mechanisms, the hope is to contribute to the development and refinement of Indonesia's dispute resolution landscape for the benefit of businesses and stakeholders alike.
The International Law Principle for People with Disabilities: Analyzing Access to Justice Ridwan Arifin; Iqbal Baiquni; Januari Nasya Ayu Taduri; Rasdi Rasdi; Zikkri Zikkri
Unnes Law Journal Vol 7 No 2 (2021): Unnes L.J. (October, 2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v7i2.50180

Abstract

Disability groups are one of the groups that are vulnerable to various violations of their rights. In fact, the protection of this group has been regulated both nationally and internationally. The International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities or the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) clearly outlines the principles that must be met in providing protection for persons with disabilities, ranging from: (1) respecting the inherent dignity, autonomy the individual including the freedom to make one's own choices, and the freedom of people; (2) non-discrimination, (3) full and effective participation and inclusion in society; (4) respecting the differences and acceptance of people with disabilities as part of human diversity and humanity; (5) equality of opportunity; (6) accessibility; (7) equality between men and women; and (8) respect for the evolving capacities of children with disabilities and respect for the right of children with disabilities to maintain their identity.
The International Law Principle for People with Disabilities: Analyzing Access to Justice Ridwan Arifin; Iqbal Baiquni; Januari Nasya Ayu Taduri; Rasdi Rasdi; Zikkri Zikkri
Unnes Law Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): October, 2021
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v7i2.38701

Abstract

Disability groups are one of the groups that are vulnerable to various violations of their rights. In fact, the protection of this group has been regulated both nationally and internationally. The International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities or the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) clearly outlines the principles that must be met in providing protection for persons with disabilities, ranging from: (1) respecting the inherent dignity, autonomy the individual including the freedom to make one's own choices, and the freedom of people; (2) non-discrimination, (3) full and effective participation and inclusion in society; (4) respecting the differences and acceptance of people with disabilities as part of human diversity and humanity; (5) equality of opportunity; (6) accessibility; (7) equality between men and women; and (8) respect for the evolving capacities of children with disabilities and respect for the right of children with disabilities to maintain their identity.