Muhamad Iqbal
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pamulang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

MENCIPTAKAN SISTEM PERADILAN EFISIEN DENGAN SISTEM E-COURT PADA PENGADILAN NEGERI DAN PENGADILAN AGAMA SE-TANGERANG RAYA Susanto Susanto; Muhamad Iqbal; Wawan Supriyatna
JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) Vol 6, No 1 (2020): JCH (JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM)
Publisher : STIH Putri Maharaja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33760/jch.v6i1.287

Abstract

Based on the Decree of the Secretary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 305/SEK/SK/VII/2018, the Supreme Court has chosen 17 District Courts, 6 State Administrative Courts and 9 Religious Courts as the Pilot Project Court for the e-court Application. On this basis, the sample of the court taken by the author is the District Court and Religious Court which is located in Tangerang Raya. The author will focus on the effectiveness and efficiency with regard to the role of the e-court system in the administrative system of the district and religious courts in Tangerang Raya. The large amount of time and files involved are considered far from the principles of fast, simple and low cost trial. It is hoped that time and cost efficiency problems can be resolved with E-court. To prove the test of the effective role of e-court in realizing fast, simple and low cost judiciary from the segmentation of district and religious courts in Tangerang Raya, the E-court system in state and religious courts in the Greater Tangerang area in segmentation creates efficiency in the case administration service process.
Representation of Justice in the Phenomenon of No Viral No Justice and the Shadow of the Electronic Information and Transaction Law Muhamad Iqbal; Iin Indriani; Susanto
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.6105

Abstract

The concept of viral has become a new phenomenon in society, which is different from oral rumors or traditional issues because it manifests itself in the form of content on social media. Although it is considered a channel for free speech, virality is often based on emotion and subjectivity, thus giving rise to debates regarding the justice it produces. The phenomenon of "No Viral No Justice" shows that public opinion is often used as the basis for social justice, which is dangerous because viral justice does not always reflect objective truth. On the other hand, the Information and Electronic Transactions Law (ITE Law) is actually designed to regulate the proportionate delivery of information, not to restrict freedom of opinion. However, the implementation of the ITE Law is often misinterpreted as a tool to suppress public voices, thereby creating a fear of speaking out. Therefore, it is important to understand that virality can be a tool to raise awareness of certain issues, but it should not be used as a means of public justice. In the framework of democracy, a balance between freedom of speech and information regulation is needed so that justice is maintained without sacrificing public discussion space.