Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL HUKUM Jurnal Hukum tora: Hukum mengatur dan melindungi masyarakat
Bernard Nainggolan
Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pembuktian Elektronik Dalam Kepailitan Bernard Nainggolan
to-ra Vol. 6 No. 3 (2020): Desember
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33541/JtVol5Iss2pp102

Abstract

Menjadi penting untuk dibahas tentang simpang siur dari proses pembuktian oleh Hakim yang memutus permohonan PKPU dan Kepailitan di Pengadilan Niaga. Sebagian Hakim memilih bukti yang bersumber dari perangkat digital telah cukup meyakinkan Hakim untuk memutus, namun sebagian Hakim memilih bahwa bukti tersebut tidak cukup kuat untuk dipergunakan sebagai pertimbangan untuk memutuskan sebuah permohonan. Dalam proses permohonan PKPU dan Kepailitan diperlukan adanya pembuktian tentang apakah pemohon telah mampu membuktikan dalil tentang telah terdapat dua kreditor dan salah satu sudah jatuh tempo dan dapat ditagih (vide Pasal 2 ayat (1) UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang PKPU dan Kepailitan). Pembuktian ini menurut hukum dilakukan secara sederhana (Pasal 8 ayat (4) UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang PKPU dan Kepailitan). Kerancuan terjadi terus menerus dan berimplikasi kepada perkembangan PKPU dan Kepailitan itu sendiri, sehingga memerlukan penyesuaian lebih lanjut.
RECONSTRUCTING COPYRIGHT PROTECTION FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-GENERATED WORKS Bernard Nainggolan; Suwarno Suwarno; Keisha Dearin Dafa
Jurnal Hukum Vol 42, No 3 (2026): Vol 42 No 3 (2026)
Publisher : Unissula

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jh.v42i3.53948

Abstract

The development of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transformed the process of intellectual creation and raised issues regarding authorship and copyright ownership. However, Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright is still based on the human authorship paradigm and therefore does not provide legal certainty for works produced with the help of AI. This study aims to analyze the adequacy of legal protection for AI works, identify weaknesses in the concept of creator in Indonesian copyright law, and formulate a Human-Centered Copyright Ownership model. The study uses a normative legal method with a statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case approach through an analysis of laws and regulations, international instruments, court decisions, doctrines, and scientific literature. The results of the study indicate that Indonesian copyright law still experiences a normative vacuum regarding the ownership of AI works and therefore is unable to provide legal certainty. As a novelty, this study offers a Human-Centered Copyright Ownership model that positions AI as a creative tool, while copyright ownership is determined based on substantial human creative contribution. This model provides more objective normative parameters for determining creators and copyright holders and serves as a basis for reforming the Copyright Law to achieve a balance between protecting human creativity, legal certainty, and technological innovation.
Co-Authors Keisha Dearin Dafa Suwarno Suwarno