Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perbandingan Konstruksi Perkerasan Lentur Dan Perkerasan Kaku Pada Jalan Gulang-Gulang Dusun Koto Kota Sawah Lunto Sta 0+000 – 0+500 Km Wiwin Putri Zayu; Gusni Vitri; Hazmal Herman; Rangga Fadel
Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmiah Eksakta Vol 1 No 1 (2022): Jurnal Hasi Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmiah Eksakta - JPPIE
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Dharma Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1053.376 KB) | DOI: 10.47233/jppie.v1i1.360

Abstract

The results of the flexible pavement analysis on Jalan Gulang-Gulang Dusun Koto, Sawahlunto City are based on Component Analysis Method SKBI-2.3.26.1987 are Surface Course (Laston MS 744) 6 cm thick, Base Course (Batu Broken class A) 20 cm thick, Sub base Course (Sirtu Class A) 25 cm thick, while the rigid pavement "AASHTO 1993 method" is a concrete pavement with a thickness of 30 cm and a thin concrete foundation layer (LC) with a thickness of 10 cm. The analysis uses continuous concrete pavement with reinforcement with a plate thickness of 30 cm using shoulders and using D10-20 cm reinforcement for longitudinal and transverse directions. The dowel is installed with D-36 reinforcement with a length of 45 cm, a distance of 30 cm, while the tie bar is installed with D-16 BJTU-24 threaded steel reinforcement with a length of 30 cm. while the tie bar is installed with D-16 BJTU-24 threaded steel reinforcement with a length of 700 mm and a distance of 75 cm. The cost of rigid pavement construction is Rp. 3,039,054,000, - with skinny concrete (LC) specifications of K-175 kg/cm2 and cement concrete layer of K-250 kg/cm2, flexible pavement is Rp.2,910,136,000. shows that flexible pavement can save costs of Rp.128,918,000. With a percentage of 4.24% of the cost of rigid pavement construction. From the results of the comparison of the cost of flexible pavement construction which is cheaper and saves costs
Desain Ulang Struktur Bangunan Gedung Hotel Ibis Padang Dengan Tinjauan Fixed Base Hazmal Herman; Dede Capry; Wiwin Putri Zayu
Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmiah Eksakta Vol 1 No 1 (2022): Jurnal Hasi Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmiah Eksakta - JPPIE
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Dharma Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1462.156 KB) | DOI: 10.47233/jppie.v1i1.400

Abstract

Reinforced concrete structure is a structural forming material that is still widely used. Concrete structure has advantages in the ease of materials and also the workmanship. Reinforced concrete is also more effectively used for structures that have a less long span. Ibis Padang Hotel building planning uses reinforced concrete structures with reference to SNI 2847:2013 on Structural Concrete Requirements for Buildings and SNI 1726:2012 on Earthquake Resilience Planning Procedures for Building And Non-Building Structures. The burdens that occurred were reviewed in SNI 1727:2013 on The Indonesian Demolition Regulation for Buildings and Other Buildings. This planning uses a dual system of SRPMK and sliding walls in terms of earthquake anchoring. The concept of this plan is based on the ultimate design that occurs, where the ultimate value must be smaller than the cross-sectional strength of the structural components. Style calculation – style in using the ETABS 2013 program. In addition, there is also a calculation of the Cost Budget Plan. This writing aims to find out the comparison of the structural components of the Ibis Padang Hotel building using Base Isolator with the results of planning using Fixed Base. The beam component comparison obtained a smaller yield of 15.17% for casting volume and 23.64% for repeat weight. The comparison of column components obtained smaller results of 29.17% for casting volume and 24.32% for repeat weight. Comparison of plate components obtained a smaller result of 16.58% for the repeating weight. The comparison of pile cap components obtained a smaller result of 45.98% for casting volume and 2.54% of repeating weight.