Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perbudakan di Ommelanden dan Wilayah Sulu Abad XVIII–XIX: Sebuah Tinjauan Komparatif Heru Mulyanto; Lazzuarda Pramudita Amalia; Nabiel Fakriyah Zaldi
Historia Madania: Jurnal Ilmu Sejarah Vol 6, No 1 (2022): Historia Madania: Jurnal Ilmu Sejarah
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/hm.v6i1.17856

Abstract

The areas of Sulu and Ommelanden are discussed in this study because these two places have similarities in socio-economic elements, that is slavery which is the main focus in this study. The Dutch who held slavery in Ommelanden and the Sulu Sultan who controlled slavery in Sulu becoming an interesting topics to discuss because they raise differences in a similarity. This study aims to describe the comparison of slave management systems, slave marketing, cases that have occurred and other matters related to slavery in Southeast Asia (especially in Ommelanden & Sulu). The methodology used in this research is a historical method using international literature sources which are analyzed in depth. The results showed that slavery carried out by the Dutch in Ommelanden was more organized while slavery in Sulu was based on illegal acts and was accompanied by violence. In addition, the slaves who were rented/traded in Ommelanden were obtained legally, while the Sulu slaves were obtained through piracy and kidnapping by the Illanun & Balagingi people. The difference in the subject of management creates a fundamental difference as well.Keywords: Ommelanden, Sulu, slave market, violence against slaves, slavery laws.
Penggunaan Naskah Kuno dan Arsip dalam Historiografi Indonesia: Suatu Tinjauan Kritis Heru Mulyanto
Jumantara: Jurnal Manuskrip Nusantara Vol 14, No 1 (2023): Juni
Publisher : Perpustakaan Nasional RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37014/jumantara.v14i1.3301

Abstract

Archives and ancient manuscripts are actually categorized in the primary historical sources that will determine the success of Indonesian historiography products. However, this success faced new challenges with a change in perspective from Indonesia-centric which was inclined to colonial-centric because of the dominant use of colonial archives from Indonesian manuscripts. The history of Indonesia, which should have been written with original Indonesian sources, is now more dominantly written with colonial sources. This article aims to criticize which is more dominant between local archives and manuscripts in their use to reconstructing Indonesian history. This paper also aims to prove Bambang Purwanto’s theory regarding the disorientation of Indonesian Historiography which turned away from local manuscripts oral sources. Descriptive-qualitative method is used here, to analyze influential historiographical works in Indonesia in making use of local manuscripts and archives. The results of the analysis show that historians face more challenges in using local manuscripts than colonial archives. Colonial archives are considered more straightforward and comprehensive in proving historical witness, while ancient manuscripts tend to have fictional elements that must be separated from the factual elements in them.