Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Determinan Inovasi Teknologi dan Kebijakan Pengembangan pada Industri Pangan (Determinants of Technological Innovation and Development Policy in Food Industry) Harianto, Harianto; Vidyatmoko, Dyan; Rosadi, Husni Yasin
JURNAL PANGAN Vol 22, No 4 (2013): PANGAN
Publisher : Perum BULOG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (498.437 KB) | DOI: 10.33964/jp.v22i4.124

Abstract

Inovasi teknologi memiliki peranan penting dalam pertumbuhan ekonomi di negara maju, namun demikian, kajian faktor-faktor yang menentukan inovasi teknologi di Indonesia masih terbatas. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengkaji faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi inovasi industri pangan dan merumuskan alternatif kebijakan dalam meningkatkan inovasi teknologi pada industri pangan. Penelitian menggunakan metode analisis regresi 2 SLS (Two Stage Least Square) dan analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat enam faktor yang mempengaruhi inovasi teknologi pada industri pangan. Faktor tersebut meliputi kepemimpinan, sumberdaya manusia, orientasi pembelajaran, kemampuan perusahaan dalam memberikan insentif, hubungan kerjasama perusahaan dengan pihak luar dan lokasi perusahaan. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut, didapat enam alternatif kebijakan untuk mengembangkan inovasi teknologi di industri pangan. Tiga prioritas kebijakan adalah mendorong terjadinya alih teknologi dengan lebih banyak memberikan pelatihan teknologi bagi karyawan perusahaan, mendorong dan memfasilitasi diklat bagi pimpinan perusahaan, menyelenggarakan kompetisi hasil inovasi, melakukan kebijakan alih teknologi dalam setiap pembelian mesin/peralatan serta membangun sentra/kawasan industri terpadu.Despite the fact that technological innovation and its role in the economic growth of developed countries have been much studied, but there is only little knowledge about the factors that determine technological innovation in Indonesia. Objectives of this study are to analyze the factors that effect innovation in the food industry in Indonesia and to recommend the policy alternative for technological innovation development in food industry. Analytical methods used to achieve the research objective are regression analysis with 2 SLS (Two Stage Least) method and qualitative analysis. The results show that there are six factors that influence technological innovation in the food industry. The determinants include the style of leadership, human capital, learning orientation, the company’s ability to provide incentives, company relationships with outsiders and corporate location. This implies that there are six possibilities of policy in order to promote technological innovation in food industry. 
ANALISIS FAKTOR PENENTU INOVASI TEKNOLOGI DI INDUSTRI PANGAN vidyatmoko, dyan; Rosadi, Husni Yasin; susetyanto, susetyanto; Hastuti, Pudji; Zubair, Manifas
Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Indonesia Vol. 14 No. 1 (2012)
Publisher : Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (98.689 KB) | DOI: 10.29122/jsti.v14i1.902

Abstract

Despite the fact that technological innovation and its role in the economic growth of developed countries have been much studied, but there is only little knowledge about the factors that determine technological innovation in Indonesia. In an effort to fill this gap, this study is conducted with the aim to analyze the factors that affect innovation in the food industry inIndonesia. Analytical methods used to achieve the research objective are regression analysis with 2 SLS (Two Stage Least) method and qualitative analysis. The results showed that there sixteen factors that influence technological innovation in the Indonesian food industry. By usingfurther 2 SLS method, empirical observation, in-depth interviews and discussions with experts, it is obtained the strong of technological innovation determinants to enhance technological innovation in the food industry. The determinants include the style of leadership, human capital,learning orientation, the company's ability to provide incentives / rewards, company relationships with outsiders and corporate location.
ANALISIS FAKTOR PENENTU KOMPENSASI EKSEKUTIF DAN HUBUNGAN KOMPENSASI EKSEKUTIF DENGAN KINERJA PERUSAHAAN vidyatmoko, dyan; Sanim, Bunasor; Siregar, Hermanto; Didu, M. Said
Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Indonesia Vol. 11 No. 3 (2009)
Publisher : Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (63.362 KB) | DOI: 10.29122/jsti.v11i3.835

Abstract

The objectives of this research were (1) to analyse determinants of the influencing factors of the Indonesian Estate State-owned enterprises’ executive compensations; and (2) to analyse the relationship between compensation executive and firm performances. Statistical methods used for analysing these objectives were Structural Equation Model (SEM), contingency analysis, regresion analysis and qualitative analysis. The study found out that from all identified variables, executive decision mechanism, job complexity, firm size, firm ability to pay compensation, and product diversification and market expansionhad positive correlation and significant influenced to executive compensation. Human capital, business risk, executive employment market had significant correlations to executive compensation. The research had also shown a result that executive compensation provide positive correlation and significant influence towards financial performance (EBIT), customer performance (sales volume, output price, market area), internal process performance (OER target, OER realisation), and growth and learning performance (number of training investment, number of employees participated intraining). However, executive compensation did not give positive correlation and significant influenced towards financial performance (ROE) and customer performance(market share). This research also showed that direction of executive compensation was heading to company’s performance and not the opposite way.