Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Active versus Passive Equity Fund Performance in Indonesia: Evidence from Risk-Adjusted Measures and Manager Fees (2018–2025) Erika Marthalina Sitorus; Maria Ulpah
Owner : Riset dan Jurnal Akuntansi Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Article Research January 2026
Publisher : Politeknik Ganesha Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33395/owner.v10i1.3015

Abstract

This study examines whether actively managed Indonesian equity mutual funds deliver superior net-of-fee, risk-adjusted performance compared to the Jakarta Composite Index (JCI) as a proxy for passive investment. Using a quantitative approach, the analysis covers 119 conventional Indonesian equity mutual funds over the period 2018–2025, encompassing pre-COVID, COVID, and post-COVID market regimes. Risk-adjusted performance is evaluated using the CAPM-based Single Index Model and a matrix of Sharpe ratio, Treynor ratio, and Jensen’s alpha, with non-parametric statistical tests applied to assess performance differentials. The results indicate that, after fees, active equity mutual funds underperform the JCI benchmark across most performance measures, with median Sharpe ratios and Jensen’s alphas not statistically different from or lower than the benchmark. Evidence of partial market efficiency and widespread closet indexing is observed, while any behavioural mispricing appears insufficient to generate persistent alpha capable of offsetting higher management and expense fees. These findings suggest that active management does not provide significant added value in the Indonesian equity market over the long term. Investors may benefit more from passive investment strategies, while regulators are encouraged to enhance fee transparency and performance disclosure to support informed investment decisions.
Beyond The Green Label : Macro, Structural and ESG Drivers of Global Green Bond Yields Rine Dewi Mustikasari; Maria Ulpah
Owner : Riset dan Jurnal Akuntansi Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Artikel Research April 2026
Publisher : Politeknik Ganesha Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33395/owner.v10i2.3037

Abstract

Evidence on the pricing of green bonds remains mixed across global markets, particularly in emerging economies where macro-financial risks often overshadow sustainability commitments. Existing research rarely integrates sovereign risk, inflation dynamics, and structural market depth into assessments of whether ESG performance lowers financing costs, leaving the mechanisms behind cross-country variation insufficiently understood. This study identifies the key determinants of green bond yields worldwide and evaluates whether strong sustainability performance effectively reduces borrowing costs, with a specific focus on Indonesia as a representative emerging market. The analysis draws on Signaling Theory, which views ESG commitments as credibility-enhancing disclosures, and on the semi-strong Efficient Market Hypothesis, which suggests that markets incorporate sustainability information only after accounting for fundamental macroeconomic risks. Using 1,362 green bonds issued between 2014 -2023, the study applies a two-layer analytical framework combining Extreme Gradient Boosting with Shapley Additive Explanations to capture non-linear yield dynamics and quantify each variable’s marginal contribution. Robust tests examine stability across pre-crisis, crisis, and post-crisis regimes. Structural and macroeconomic factors especially domicile is the dominant driver of yield formation. ESG attributes remain relevant, but the social pillar exerts the strongest influence, while environmental and governance dimensions function largely as baseline compliance indicators. Indonesia displays a distinctive high-yield, high-ESG pattern driven by inflation pressure, sovereign-risk premia, and shallow market depth. ESG advantages reduce yields only after core macro-financial risks are incorporated. Strengthening macro stability and institutional credibility is essential for sustainability performance to translate into lower financing costs in emerging markets. This study provides one of the first large-scale, cross-country assessments using machine learning and explainable AI to reveal how structural constraints moderate the effect of ESG performance on green bond pricing.
Does Income Diversification Improve Bank Performance? A Panel Study of Regional Development Banks and Commercial Banks in Indonesia Rizka Rimasda; Maria Ulpah
EKOMBIS REVIEW: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Bisnis Vol 14 No 3 (2026): Juli
Publisher : UNIVED Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/ekombis.v14i3.11521

Abstract

This study examines the effect of income diversification on bank performance in Indonesia using a Fixed Effect model with clustered standard errors. Bank performance is measured by ROA, ROE, SHROA, SHROE, and Z_SCORE, while income diversification is proxied by DIV_ADJ. The model also includes bank type, digitalization, and several control variables such as bank size, capital adequacy, operational costs, credit risk, and macroeconomic conditions. The results show that income diversification has a positive and significant effect only on risk-adjusted performance (SHROA and SHROE), but not on conventional profitability or stability. The moderating effects of bank type and digitalization are partial and inconsistent. Among control variables, bank size is the most consistent determinant of performance, while capital adequacy improves stability and credit risk reduces performance. Overall, income diversification mainly enhances bank performance through risk-adjusted measures, and its effectiveness depends on bank characteristics and risk management quality.