Erial Bahar
Sriwijaya University

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Factors associated with the length of stay of deep neck abscess patients Lisa Apri Yanti; Friska Meutia Lubis; Erial Bahar; Abla Ghanie
Oto Rhino Laryngologica Indonesiana Vol 52, No 1 (2022): VOLUME 52, NO. 1 JANUARY - JUNE 2022
Publisher : PERHATI-KL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32637/orli.v52i1.473

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground: Deep neck abscess is an accumulation of pus in one or more potential spaces of the deep neck fascia. Complications of deep neck abscesses are considered as an emergency in the Ear Nose Throat–Head and Neck field. One determining factor of prognosis in deep neck abscess patients is the length of stay in the hospital.  Objective: To find out the factors associated with the hospital length of stay of deep neck abscess patients. Method: Observational research using a cross sectional design. Data collection was carried out using medical record data on 91 subjects diagnosed with deep neck abscess at Dr. Mohammad Hoesin Hospital Palembang from July 2018 to May 2021. Result: From the 91 samples studied, the average hospital length of stay for deep neck abscess patients was 11.26 days. The study found factors related to the length of stay in the hospital, namely comorbidities (p=0.005), location of the abscess (p=0.004), pus culture (p=0.003), and the number of deep-neck spaces involved (p=0.005). Linear regression found that the most significant factors on the hospital length of stay were the involvement of abscess in 2 or more deep neck spaces (p = 0.002) and the presence of comorbidities (p = 0.005). Conclusion: Abscess involvement in 2 deep neck spaces or more and the presence of comorbidities were the most influential factors associated with the hospital length of stay in deep-neck abscess patients.ABSTRAKLatar Belakang: Abses leher dalam adalah akumulasi pus pada satu atau lebih ruang potensial fasia leher dalam sebagai akibat penjalaran infeksi. Komplikasi abses leher dalam masih merupakan keadaan darurat di bidang THT-KL. Salah satu faktor penentu prognosis adalah lama rawat di rumah sakit. Banyak faktor yang dapat mempengaruhi lama rawat pasien abses leher dalam di rumah sakit. Tujuan: Untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan lama rawat pasien abses leher dalam di RSUP Dr. Mohammad Hoesin Palembang. Metode: Penelitian observasional yang menggunakan rancangan potong lintang. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan data rekam medis pada 91 subjek dengan diagnosis abses leher dalam di RSUP Dr. Mohammad Hoesin Palembang periode Juli 2018 sampai dengan Mei 2021. Hasil: Dari 91 sampel yang dilakukan penelitian, rerata lama rawat di rumah sakit pada pasien abses leher dalam adalah 11,26 hari. Penelitian mendapatkan faktor yang berhubungan dengan lama rawat di rumah sakit yaitu komorbid (p=0,005), lokasi abses (p=0,004), kultur pus (p=0,003), dan jumlah ruang leher dalam yang terlibat (p=0,005). Dari uji regresi linier didapatkan faktor yang paling memengaruhi lama rawat di rumah sakit adalah keterlibatan abses ³ 2 ruang leher dalam (p=0,002) dan terdapat komorbid (p=0,005). Kesimpulan: Keterlibatan abses pada 2 ruang leher dalam atau lebih, dan terdapatnya komorbid adalah faktor yang paling berpengaruh terhadap lama rawat pasien abses leher dalam.
Comparison of fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing findings between neurogenic and non-neurogenic dysphagia patients Puspa Zuleika; Melania Jalili; Erial Bahar; Abla Ghanie
Oto Rhino Laryngologica Indonesiana Vol 52, No 1 (2022): VOLUME 52, NO. 1 JANUARY - JUNE 2022
Publisher : PERHATI-KL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32637/orli.v52i1.475

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground: Dysphagia is the difficulty or discomfort on swallowing which can affects a person’s quality of life. Based on pathophysiology, dysphagia can be classified as neurogenic and non-neurogenic. One method of diagnosis is to use a flexible endoscope called the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Examination of Swallowing (FEES). The basic findings obtained from the FEES examination were standing secretion, silent aspiration, hypopharyngeal sensitivity, leakage, residue, penetration and aspiration. Objective: To compare the findings of the FEES examination between patients with neurogenic and non-neurogenic dysphagia. Method: Observational research using cross sectional design. Data collection was carried out using medical record data on 94 subjects with dysphagia who underwent FEES examination at Dr. Mohammad Hoesin Hospital Palembang from January 2019 to January 2021. Result: The most common FEES finding in neurogenic dysphagia were filtered purée residue, milk residue, and biscuit residue. In the non-neurogenic dysphagia group, the most common FEES finding was filtered purée residue. There were significant differences in FEES findings between neurogenic dysphagia and non-neurogenic dysphagia in filtered purée residue (p=0.014), rice purée residue (p=0.017), flour purée residue (p=0.007), and biscuit puree penetration (p=0.017). Conclusion: There were significant differences in FEES findings between neurogenic dysphagia and non-neurogenic dysphagia concerning residue of filtered purée, residue of rice purée, residue of flour purée, and biscuit penetration. From regression analysis, the dominant factors found in neurogenic dysphagia were filtered purée penetration, flour purée residue, biscuit penetration, and found in non-neurogenic dysphagia were flour purée penetration and biscuit puree leakage.ABSTRAKLatar belakang: Disfagia adalah kesulitan atau gangguan proses menelan, yang dapat memengaruhi kualitas hidup seseorang. Berdasarkan patofisiologinya, disfagia dapat diklasifikasikan menjadi neurogenik dan non-neurogenik. Salah satu metode diagnosis adalah dengan menggunakan Fiberoptic Endoscopic Examination of Swallowing (FEES). Temuan dasar yang diperoleh dari pemeriksaan FEES adalah standing secretion, silent aspiration, sensitivitas hipofaring, leakage, residu, penetrasi dan aspirasi. Tujuan: Membandingkan hasil pemeriksaan FEES antara pasien disfagia neurogenik dan non-neurogenik. Metode: Penelitian observasional dengan desain potong lintang. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan data rekam medis pada 94 subjek disfagia yang menjalani pemeriksaan FEES di Rumah Sakit Dr. Mohammad Hoesin Palembang dari Januari 2019 hingga Januari 2021. Hasil: Temuan FEES yang paling umum pada disfagia neurogenik adalah residu bubur saring, residu susu, dan residu biskuit. Pada kelompok disfagia non-neurogenik, temuan FEES yang paling umum adalah residu bubur saring. Terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan dalam temuan FEES antara disfagia neurogenik dan disfagia non-neurogenik pada residu bubur saring (p=0,014), residu bubur nasi (p=0,017), residu bubur tepung (p=0,007), dan penetrasi bubur biskuit (p=0,017). Kesimpulan: Terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan dalam temuan FEES antara disfagia neurogenik dan disfagia non-neurogenik pada residu bubur saring, residu bubur beras, residu bubur tepung, serta penetrasi bubur biskuit.  Dari analisis regresi ditemukan faktor dominan di disfagia neurogenik adalah penetrasi bubur saring, residu bubur tepung, penetrasi bubur biskuit, dan di disfagia non-neurogenik adalah penetrasi bubur tepung dan kebocoran bubur biskuit.
Correlation of docetaxel administration duration, dosage, and patient age with epiphora severity: a retrospective observational study in breast cancer patients Riani Erna; Dita Mintardi; Nur Qodir; Erial Bahar
Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): JKP
Publisher : Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy (IICET)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/1145600

Abstract

Epiphora, or excessive tearing, is a frequent yet under-recognised adverse effect of docetaxel, a taxane-based chemotherapeutic agent used in breast cancer treatment. Inflammatory and fibrotic changes within the lacrimal drainage system are hypothesised as the primary mechanisms. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between docetaxel administration duration and epiphora severity, alongside the impact of cumulative dosage and patient age. A retrospective observational study was conducted at Mohammad Hoesin Hospital Palembang, involving 25 breast cancer patients who reported epiphora during docetaxel chemotherapy. Patients with pre-existing ocular conditions, prior lacrimal surgery, or concurrent use of epiphora-inducing medications were excluded. Epiphora severity was assessed using the Munk score, and statistical analyses included Pearson’s correlation and multiple regression. Findings demonstrated a strong positive correlation between epiphora severity and docetaxel duration (r = 0.645, p < 0.05), cumulative dosage (r = 0.618, p < 0.05), and patient age (r = 0.703, p < 0.05). Limitations include the retrospective design, small sample size, and subjective assessment tools. These results emphasise the importance of monitoring for epiphora during docetaxel therapy, with early ophthalmologic intervention recommended. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify pathophysiological mechanisms and optimise management strategies for chemotherapy-induced epiphora.