Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.87
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik Brikolase : Jurnal Kajian Teori, Praktik dan Wacana Seni Budaya Rupa Devotion: Journal of Research and Community Service Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Amicus Curiae
Arif Wicaksana
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 20 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search
Journal : amicus curiae

 1 
PENERAPAN ASAS KELANGSUNGAN USAHA (BUSINESS GOING CONCERN) DALAM SISTEM HUKUM KEPAILITAN INDONESIA: Application of the Business Going Concern Principle in the Indonesian Bankruptcy Law System Manangi, Izra Charistulus; Wicaksana, Arif
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19748

Abstract

One of the four principles stipulated by Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Obligations for Debt Payment is the Business Continuity Principle. The concept of business continuity which is also called "Business Going Concern" focuses on the continued existence of the debtor company, so that it is hoped that bankruptcy will not occur. The problem is how to implement Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning the Principles of Business Continuity; Meanwhile, data processing was carried out qualitatively, normative research was carried out to find answers to these problems, and deductive methods were used to draw conclusions. The existing analysis results in the conclusion that Article 179 to Article 184 of Law Number 37 of 2004 justifies the application of the Business Continuity Principle.
ASET JAMINAN ATAS NAMA PIHAK KETIGA SEBAGAI HARTA PAILIT (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 15/Pdt.SUS-GUGATAN LAIN-LAIN /2019/ PN.NIAGA .JKT.PST): Security Assets On Behalf Of Third Parties As Bankruptcy Property (Study Decision Number: 15/Pdt.Sus-Other Lawsuits/2019/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst) Siagian, Nico Grevandi M; Wicaksana, Arif
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/s4t3j821

Abstract

Bankruptcy often occurs when the list of bankruptcy assets of bankrupt debtors is added to the collateral assets of non-debtor third parties by the curator, this is done to protect the interests of creditors. This study intends to discover whether the bankruptcy estate includes the collateral assets of non-debtor third parties, as well as to see the authority of the curator to execute collateral assets owned by third parties who are not bankruptcy debtors. In this normative legal research, qualitative descriptive analysis is utilized. It was found that this research concludes that bankruptcy assets do not include debt guarantees owned by third parties Thus, there is no authority possessed by the curator in managing the debt guarantees of bankrupt debtors, which is contrary to Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy & Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, as found in Decision Number: 15/Pdt.Sus-Other Suits/2019/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Bankruptcy is a legal issue that is quite complex, so it requires caution in discussion and decision-making.
ASET JAMINAN ATAS NAMA PIHAK KETIGA SEBAGAI HARTA PAILIT (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 15/Pdt.SUS-GUGATAN LAIN-LAIN /2019/ PN.NIAGA .JKT.PST): Security Assets On Behalf Of Third Parties As Bankruptcy Property (Study Decision Number: 15/Pdt.Sus-Other Lawsuits/2019/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst) Siagian, Nico Grevandi M; Wicaksana, Arif
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.20099

Abstract

Bankruptcy often occurs when the list of bankruptcy assets of bankrupt debtors is added to the collateral assets of non-debtor third parties by the curator, this is done to protect the interests of creditors. This study intends to discover whether the bankruptcy estate includes the collateral assets of non-debtor third parties, as well as to see the authority of the curator to execute collateral assets owned by third parties who are not bankruptcy debtors. In this normative legal research, qualitative descriptive analysis is utilized. It was found that this research concludes that bankruptcy assets do not include debt guarantees owned by third parties Thus, there is no authority possessed by the curator in managing the debt guarantees of bankrupt debtors, which is contrary to Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy & Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, as found in Decision Number: 15/Pdt.Sus-Other Suits/2019/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Bankruptcy is a legal issue that is quite complex, so it requires caution in discussion and decision-making.
LEGALITAS DAN PENGGOLONGAN ASET KRIPTO (STUDI PERBANDINGAN: INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT): Crypto Assets Legality and Classification (Comparative Studies: Indonesia and United States of America) Sulaiman, Eric Joses; Wicaksana, Arif
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/j75b8710

Abstract

Crypto Assets are digital assets that use blockchain-based cryptographic processes. Several countries already had regulations regarding Crypto Assets including Indonesia which classifies Crypto Assets as a commodity. Whereas in United States (US) Crypto Assets can be classifiedas a security. In this research discuss about legality,classification, and application of crypto assets in Indonesia and US. This research using normative research method with descriptive approach. Using secondary data and by documentation review, and the data analized by aqualitative. From this research can concluded there is difference clasificiation between Indonesia which classified Crypto Assets only as commodity and the US which not limit the classification of Crypto Assets, it can be commodity and also security. Examples of these Crypto Assets include XRP and AMP Tokens which are considered security by the Securities Exchange Commision. The suggestion is Indonesia should not directly classified all Crypto Assets as a commodity.
TINDAKAN WANPRESTASI OLEH NASABAH BERINISIAL RS PADA PT. BANK PEMBIAYAAN RAKYAT SYARIAH AMANAH UMMAH PUSAT: Tort Actions By A Customer With The Initials RS At PT. Bank Pembiayaan Rakyat Syariah Amanah Ummah Pusat Bintang Nugraha Putra; Arif Wicaksana
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i2.22878

Abstract

The Murabahah Agreement is one of the contracts implemented in Sharia banking where the contract is carried out using a buying and selling system to obtain a profit by adhering strictly to the principles established by Islamic teachings. In this case, the contract executed between PT. Bank Pembiayaan Rakyat Syariah Amanah Ummah Pusat with a customer with the initials RS which creates a legal relationship, namely the existence of rights and obligations for each party. However, it cannot be easy to fulfill what has been agreed upon in the Murabahah agreement, and of course, with this, some problems arise, namely default or broken promises. This default is a situation where one party does not carry out the obligations he has agreed to. In this research, the customer with the initials RS was correct in acts of default or breaking promises by making installment payments and carrying out provisions that were prohibited in the Murabahah agreement that he had agreed to with PT. Bank Pembiayaan Rakyat Syariah Amanah Ummah Pusat.
PEMBERHENTIAN DIREKSI DAN DEWAN PENGAWAS PERUSAHAAN UMUM DAERAH (PERUMDA) PENAJAM BENUO TAKA ENERGI: The Dismissal of the Directors and Supervisory Board of the Regional Public Company (Perumda) Penajam Benuo Taka Energi Muhammad Reza Akbar Fachrezi; Arif Wicaksana
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i2.23003

Abstract

The Regional Public Company called Penajam Benuo Taka Energi (PBTE) is a Regional Owned Enterprise which was formed in the framework of North Penajam Paser Regency's participation in share ownership through a Participating Interest (PI) mechanism. However, along with the capital investment, the Main Director of Perumda PBTE violated Article 65 jo. Article 66 PP No. 54/2017, which resulted in the issuance of PPU Regent Decree No. 539/122/2022. With problem identification, namely how a Perumda carries out activities related to the management of Perumda or legal relations with other parties, if there is a vacancy in the board of directors at Perumda Penajam Benuo Taka Energi. The result and the conclusion as a result, since the issuance of the decree, there has been a vacancy in the board of directors at Perumda PBTE. By the provisions of Article 71 paragraph (1) PP 54/2017, "In the event of a vacancy in the positions of all members of the Board of Directors." Based on these provisions, North Penajam Paser Regent Decree No. 539/123/2022 was issued concerning the Appointment of the Supervisory Board as the Acting Task Force (Plt) of Perumda PBTE, specifically the Supervisory Board of Perumda PBTE.
TANGGUNG JAWAB MANTAN DIREKSI PT DINAR KALIMANTAN COAL ATAS PELANGGARAN PRINSIP FIDUCIARY DUTY DAN GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: Responsibilities Of The Former Directors Of Pt Dinar Kalimantan Coal For Violation Of Principles Of Fiduciary Duty And Good Corporate Governance Naufaldi Eka Kurniawan; Arif Wicaksana
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.24986

Abstract

PT Dinar Kalimantan Coal as a limited liability company operating in the coal mining sector is obliged to pay PNBP in the form of Royalties and Fixed Contributions to the state. The board of directors as the company organ representing the company is supposed to pay the PNBP, but Haspin Walad and Yossyka Herdian Gederaharja as the former board of directors of PT Dinar Kalimantan Coal for the 2011-2019 period neglected their duties and did not provide the company's financial reports to shareholders. The main problem in this research is whether Haspin Walad and Yossyka Herdian Gederaharja violated the principles of fiduciary duty and good corporate governance and how they are held accountable. Researchers use normative juridical research methods with descriptive research characteristics and use secondary data. The research results were analyzed qualitatively and conclusions were drawn using deductive logic. The results of this research prove that the former board of directors of PT DKC violated the principles of fiduciary duty in Article 66, Article 97 paragraph (2) of the 2007 PT Law, Article 8 of the DP Law and good corporate governance, namely the principles of openness, accountability, responsibility, independence and fairness. So that it causes losses to the company, therefore you can be held responsible up to your personal assets based on Article 97 paragraph (3) of the 2007 PT Law by filing a lawsuit in court based on an unlawful act in Article 1365 of the Civil Code
PERLINDUNGAN PT PEGADAIAN AKIBAT BARANG GADAI HASIL CURIAN Berlianti, Betari Julia; Wicaksana, Arif
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v3i1.25675

Abstract

PT Pegadaian sebagai lembaga pembiayaan berbasis gadai berpotensi mengalami kerugian apabila barang jaminan yang diterima merupakan hasil tindak pidana pencurian. Permasalahan hukum muncul ketika barang gadai dikembalikan kepada pemilik asli berdasarkan putusan pengadilan pidana, sementara kewajiban debitur belum dilunasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis perlindungan hukum bagi PT Pegadaian sebagai penerima gadai beriktikad baik terhadap barang jaminan hasil curian. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan studi kasus Putusan Nomor 49/Pid.B/2023/PN Mnd. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PT Pegadaian telah menerapkan Customer Due Diligence (CDD) sesuai POJK Nomor 8 Tahun 2023 dan bertindak berdasarkan asas iktikad baik. Namun, pengembalian barang kepada pemilik asli menyebabkan hapusnya hak gadai sebagaimana Pasal 1152 ayat (3) KUHPerdata dan menimbulkan kerugian finansial. Meskipun Pasal 1152 ayat (4) dan Pasal 1977 ayat (1) KUHPerdata memberikan perlindungan bagi penerima gadai beriktikad baik, perlindungan tersebut belum efektif dalam praktik. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan mekanisme perlindungan hukum bagi kreditur tanpa mengesampingkan hak pemilik sah.
Co-Authors Amriyati Amriyati Berlianti, Betari Julia Bintang Nugraha Putra Cholis, Henry Dine Qieftiah Gabriel Sibtua Sianturi Harmono Ibrahim Aulia Akbar Ilma Zhafirah Albar Manangi, Izra Charistulus Muhammad Khazas Fadhila Djou Muhammad Reza Akbar Fachrezi Naufaldi Eka Kurniawan Raja Abdurrafi Arifin Siregar Sari Yuniarti Sari, Andari Yuriko Shanda Amarissa Siagian, Nico Grevandi M Sulaiman, Eric Joses Sumitro Salim Utomo, Gabriel Bramantyo