Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perbandingan Keefektifan Metode Case-Based Reasoning dan Certainty Factor dalam Sistem Pakar Diagnosis Penyakit Multiple Sclerosis Hanifah Ekawati; Ita Arfyanti; Tommy Bustomi
JURNAL MEDIA INFORMATIKA BUDIDARMA Vol 7, No 4 (2023): Oktober 2023
Publisher : Universitas Budi Darma

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30865/mib.v7i4.6574

Abstract

The management of complex neurological diseases such as Multiple Sclerosis (MS) requires accurate and efficient diagnostic approaches. To enhance diagnostic precision, a study has conducted a comparison between two approaches within the framework of an expert system, namely the Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) Method and the Certainty Factor (CF) Method. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of these two methods in supporting the diagnosis process of Multiple Sclerosis. The Case-Based Reasoning Method is an approach that relies on past experiences to address new issues. Within an expert system, CBR utilizes knowledge from previous cases to identify diagnoses that align with the current situation. On the other hand, the Certainty Factor Method is an approach that measures the confidence level in a statement based on rules and associated confidence factors. This study makes use of a dataset containing information from previous cases related to the diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. By employing both of these methods, an expert system is developed to provide diagnostic recommendations based on inputted symptoms and data. The effectiveness of both approaches is evaluated through diagnostic accuracy, computational speed, and confidence levels in the generated results. Research findings indicate that both methods have their respective strengths and weaknesses. The CBR method tends to yield accurate results by referring to similar cases in the past, but it may encounter challenges in unique or rare cases. On the other hand, the Certainty Factor Method has the ability to handle uncertainty and can produce results with measurable confidence levels. However, dependence on predefined rules may limit adaptation to new cases. In conclusion, this study underscores that there is no singular perfect approach within expert systems for diagnosing Multiple Sclerosis. Both the CBR and Certainty Factor methods contribute in their own ways to improving accuracy and confidence in the diagnosis process. Therefore, integrating these two methods could be a promising direction for the development of expert systems in the future.
Student Class Grouping in Junior High Schools Based on Academic Performance Using the Fuzzy C-Means Method Tommy Bustomi; Jundro Daud Hasiholan; Kusno Harianto
Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS) Vol 7 No 3 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/bits.v7i3.8585

Abstract

Abstrak−Differences in academic abilities among junior high school students often pose a challenge for schools in conducting class groupings objectively and efficiently. Many educational institutions, including SMP Negeri Y, still rely on manual grouping methods that are subjective and do not accurately reflect the actual conditions of students. Inaccurate grouping may lead to imbalanced learning processes, where students with high and low academic abilities are placed in the same group without considering their performance variations. Therefore, a data-driven approach is needed to represent student characteristics comprehensively and flexibly. This study aims to apply the Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) method to cluster students of SMP Negeri Y based on four main attributes: Academic Average, Attitude Score, Activeness Score, and Attendance. The FCM method was chosen for its ability to handle data uncertainty and assign multiple membership degrees to each student across different clusters. Prior to clustering, the data underwent a preprocessing stage involving data cleaning, normalization using StandardScaler, and scale adjustment across attributes to improve the accuracy of Euclidean distance calculations. The analysis results revealed the formation of two main clusters representing student academic performance levels. Cluster 0 has an average academic score of 78.37 with moderate attitude and activeness levels, while Cluster 1 shows a higher academic average of 82.18 accompanied by better attitude, activeness, and attendance scores. Based on the highest membership degree, 38 students were assigned to Cluster 0 and 26 students to Cluster 1. Model evaluation using Fuzzy Partition Coefficient (FPC), Modified Partition Coefficient (MPC), and Silhouette Score indicated the optimal configuration at a fuzziness level of m = 2, yielding FPC = 0.680, MPC = 0.359, and Silhouette Score = 0.334. These findings demonstrate that FCM is effective in representing variations in student abilities more realistically, while also providing an objective foundation for schools to design adaptive learning strategies and implement data-driven academic policies.