Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

VISIT VISA ACTIVITIES BUSINESS SPEAKER SUBJECT AND SUPERVISION Harits Rafi Putra Pradana; Kadek Sintya Anjani; Yoga Tri Hartanto
International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR) Vol 6, No 3 (2022): IJEBAR
Publisher : LPPM ITB AAS INDONESIA (d.h STIE AAS Surakarta)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29040/ijebar.v6i3.6008

Abstract

Migration Regulation Number 6 of 2011, which regulates all kinds of movements related to people's affairs both inside and outside the Indonesian Territory. Indonesia adheres to a certain strategy in which every outsider who enters the territory of Indonesia is obliged to be valuable and not endanger the interests and normal strength of the state, in an effort to maintain the security of the nation's power. Stay Permit Extension, Termination, Cancellation, and Termination of Stay Permits Owned by Outsiders, Guidelines for Priest Regulations and Basic Freedoms Number 24 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Application and Issuance of Short Visas and Visit Visas. The management of the movement of the presence and training of foreign nationals in the territory of Indonesia is an action that combines the coordination, arrangement, and prosecution of foreign nationals in the territory of Indonesia. Regulation No. 6 of 2011, particularly regarding the sorting, handling and display of information and movement data as well as the basis for the list of names of outsiders that can be fought and avoided, regulatory oversight of the presence and activities of outsiders, as well as various biometric information.
The Rule Of Law, The Constitution, And Democracy In In-donesian State Administration Practice Haryoko Bambang Widjayanto; Yoga Tri Hartanto
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): December : International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijlcj.v2i4.838

Abstract

Indonesia constitutionally declares itself as a state based on the rule of law as mandated in Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution after the amendments. This principle requires that governance and law enforcement be conducted under constitutional supremacy, legal certainty, equality before the law, and an independent judiciary. However, various political interferences, regulatory inconsistencies, and discriminatory legal practices continue to undermine these ideals. This research examines: (1) the effectiveness of the hierarchy of legislation and judicial review mechanisms by the Constitutional Court (MK) and the Supreme Court (MA) in preventing regulatory conflicts and discriminatory law enforcement; and (2) the extent to which the rule of law principle post-amendment has been manifested in equal protection before the law and judicial independence. Using a normative legal research method with statute, conceptual, case, and historical approaches, this study finds that although constitutional reforms have strengthened checks and balances and judicial authority, the persistence of selective and politically influenced law enforcement indicates that equality before the law has not been consistently implemented. Strengthening institutional integrity, improving regulatory harmonization, and ensuring the judiciary’s independence remain crucial to realizing Indonesia’s constitutional aspirations as a democratic state governed by the rule of law.