Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Behavioral Accounting Journal
Karolina Dyahayu Chandrasari
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS PEMBENTUKAN JUDGEMENT AUDITOR PADA PENILAIAN RISIKO FRAUD: PERSPEKTIF BOUNDED RATIONALITY THEORY Karolina Dyahayu Chandrasari; Eko Suwardi
Behavioral Accounting Journal Vol 4 No 2 (2021): Behavioral Accounting Journal
Publisher : Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (367.166 KB) | DOI: 10.33005/baj.v4i2.137

Abstract

External audit provides public confidence in the financial statements. However, the profession is very vulnerable to cases of fraud. So that the public's trust in the quality of the external auditors' judgement decreases. There have been many studies that discuss the factors that cause audit failure and audit quality. However, surprisingly little is known about the fundamental question: how does the rationality of individual auditors affect audit judgements? This study aims to describe the formation of auditor's judgement on fraud risk assessment using the bounded rationality model concepts. The author uses case study research with a qualitative approach. It involves a single unit of analysis in the form of an individual auditor, and discussion is carried out around the scope of the auditor's behavior by interview method. To describe the auditor's judgements, the bounded rationality model (Sharda et al., 2014) is used in the form of a combination of problem-solving concepts (Kaufman, 1992) and decision making (Simon, 1977) with a discussion associated with a socio-behavioral perspective (Gibbins, 1984). We found that the auditors adhered firmly to the template built from understanding the audit environment and systematically and sequentially described the three main processes of judgement formation in the form of simplification, validation, and rationalization. The model can also point out that not only is the satisficing concept involved, but the stopping rule concept also influences the formation of auditor judgement.
ANALISIS PEMBENTUKAN JUDGEMENT AUDITOR PADA PENILIAN RISIKO FRAUD: PERSPEKTIF BOUNDED RATIONALITY THEORY Karolina Dyahayu Chandrasari; Eko Suwardi
BAJ: Behavioral Accounting Journal Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): July-December 2021
Publisher : Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33005/baj.v4i2.137

Abstract

External audit provides public confidence in the financial statements. However, the profession is very vulnerable to cases of fraud. So that the public's trust in the quality of the external auditors' judgement decreases. There have been many studies that discuss the factors that cause audit failure and audit quality. However, surprisingly little is known about the fundamental question: how does the rationality of individual auditors affect audit judgements? This study aims to describe the formation of auditor's judgement on fraud risk assessment using the bounded rationality model concepts. The author uses case study research with a qualitative approach. It involves a single unit of analysis in the form of an individual auditor, and discussion is carried out around the scope of the auditor's behavior by interview method. We found that the auditors adhered firmly to the template built from understanding the audit environment and systematically and sequentially described the three main processes of judgement formation in the form of simplification, validation, and rationalization. The model can also point out that not only is the satisficing concept involved, but the stopping rule concept also influences the formation of auditor judgement.
Co-Authors Eko Suwardi