Judges in carrying out their duties and authorities have clear rules. To create a judiciary that is clean from corrupt practices, the performance of judges receives comprehensive and comprehensive supervision. The Supreme Court (MA), as the highest judicial power agency, carries out internal supervision, while external supervision is carried out by the Judicial Professional Honorary Commission of IKAHI and the Judicial Commission (KY). However, the facts show that bribery cases which ensnared judges are increasing and have tarnished legal institutions especially public trust in the justice system in Indonesia. This is interesting because there are still judges who do not comply with the code of ethics for judges as a guideline in carrying out their duties, this shows that the oversight function by the MA and KY has not been able to run properly. The method used is normative juridical. The results obtained state that efforts to overcome public distrust in the judiciary caused by judges who are entangled in corruption cases are by improving the selection mechanism for prospective judges so that judges are selected with professional personality and high integrity. In addition, the need to improve the MA and KY supervisory functions by increasing sanctions for violators of the judge's code of ethics.