Slamet Muljono
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bengkulu

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Review Of The Execution Of The Decision Of The Lubuklinggau State Court Number 15/Pdt.G/2018/Pn Llg Randa Alala; Slamet Muljono; Emelia Kontesa
Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 12, No 1 (2022): April 2022
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/j_bengkoelenjust.v12i1.21327

Abstract

In 2018, there was a lawsuit filed by Asbiati and Murisa Binti Nang Agus as the Plaintiffs against PT. Buana Sriwijaya Sejahtera (PT. BSS) as Defendant I, Plantation Cooperation of Tritunggal Jaya as Defendant II, Regent of Musi Rawas Utara as Defendant III, and Village Head of Biaro Lama as Co-Defendant that was submitted to the Lubuklinggau District Court and  had  been decided in  Decision  Number: 15/ Pdt.  G/2018/PN.Llg  In  the  course,  this decision  could  not  be  executed.  This  study discusses  the  reasons  for  the  Lubuklinggau District  Court  Decision  Number  15/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Llg which  has  permanent legal  force (inkracht van gewijsde) cannot be executed, as well as discussing the obstacles to the execution of the Lubuklinggau District Court Decision Number 15/Pdt.G/2018/PNLlg. Execution is the implementation of a Court Decision which has permanent legal force (in kracht van gewijsde) which is carried out forcibly by the District Court where the parties file a lawsuit caused by the losing party in the case rejecting to comply with and to carry out the Court's Decision. The approach used in this study was a normative juridical approach. This study used secondary data obtained from primary and secondary legal materials. The results of this study describe a decision that cannot be executed because there is no argument in the Plaintiffs' lawsuit that places a confiscation of collateral (conservatoir beslaag), and confiscation of execution (excekutorial beslaag) for a decision that has permanent legal force (inkracht van gewijsde), so that the decision does not have executive power. While the obstacles that arise are in the form of the absence of a time limit that serves as a guide for the Head  of  the  Lubuklinggau  District Court  to carry out  and  determine an  execution  of a decision, and the resistance by the executed party who does not want to voluntarily carry out the contents of the judge's decision. 
IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG TENTANG TATA CARA PENYELESAIAN GUGATAN SEDERHANA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI BENGKULU Dimas Dwi Arso; Slamet Muljono; Edytiawarman Edytiawarman; Nurhani Fithriah
TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL Vol 7, No 2 (2023): VOLUME 7 NUMBER 2, JULY 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Tanjungpura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26418/tlj.v7i2.59995

Abstract

AbstractSettlement of disputes in society can be resolved through the courts. Currently, there is a Supreme Court Regulation Concerning Procedures for Settlement of Simple Claims. Simple lawsuits are mild civil lawsuits with a fast case settlement process. Several restrictions have been regulated in this supreme court regulation. This is because this simple lawsuit case is designed to find a quick and straightforward solution to the legal issues faced by the parties so that a protracted settlement of claims does not occur and the payment of cases is resolved based on the principle of a fast, simple, and low-cost trial. This study aims to identify and analyze the implementation of supreme court regulation concerning Procedures for the Settlement of Simple Claims at Class IA Bengkulu District Court. The research method is carried out by empirical juridical research. The study results are the Implementation of Supreme Court Regulation concerning Procedures for Settlement of Simple Claims at the Class I Bengkulu District Court, carried out by existing regulations such as for the settlement of unlawful acts or defaults with a maximum lawsuit of Rp.500.000.000,- (Five hundred million rupiah) and settled by a single judge.However, for dispute resolution, the judge may decide more than 25 days by the supreme court regulation provisions because the judge needs more time to seek peace and give a decision to the parties in settlement of a simple lawsuit. Then the obstacle faced in the payment of a simple lawsuit at the Class I Bengkulu District Court is during the peace process when the plaintiff and the defendant do not have the same nominal value to be paid; it could be because the defendant is unable to pay off the default claim or unlawful act. AbstrakPenyelesaian sengketa dalam masyarakat dapat diselesaikan melalui pengadilan. Saat ini, telah ada Peraturan Mahkamah Agung yang mengatur Tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana. Gugatan perdata ringan dengan proses penyelesaian perkara cepat merupakan gugatan sederhana. Perma ini sudah mengatur beberapa pembatasan. Karena, penyelesaian gugatan sederhana ini merupakan gagasan guna menjadi solusi dari masalah hukum melibatkan para pihak dengan sederhana dan cepat guna tidak terjadi proses yang lama dalam penyelesaian sengketa dan penyelesaian perkara diselesaikan berdasarkan prinsip peradilan cepat, sederhana, dan biaya ringan. Penelitian ini bertujuan guna menganalisis implementasi Perma tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana di Pengadilan Negeri Kelas IA Bengkulu. Metode penelitian yuridis sosiologis digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Adapun hasil penelitian yaitu Implementasi Peraturan Mahkamah Agung tentang Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana di Pengadilan Negeri Kelas IA Bengkulu yaitu dilaksanakan dengan sesuai regulasi seperti untuk penyelesaian kasus wanprestasi atau perbuatan melawan hukum dengan gugatan maksimal Rp. 500.000.000,- (lima ratus juta rupiah) dan diselesaikan oleh hakim tunggal. Namun,untuk penyelesaian sengketa bisa saja hakim memutuskan lebih dari 25 hari sesuai dengan ketentuan Perma sebab hakim membutuhkan waktu yang lebih lama untuk mengupayakan perdamaian dan memberikan putusan kepada para pihak dalam acara peradilan gugatan sederhana. Kendala yang dihadapi melalui proses gugatan sederhana di Pengadilan Negeri Kelas IA Bengkulu yakni saat proses perdamaian bilamana antara penggugat dan tergugat tidak ada persamaan nilai nominal yang harus dibayarkan, bisa jadi karena tergugat tidak mampu melunasi gugatan perbuatan melawan hukum atau wanprestasi.