Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Process of Investigation onCriminal Actions of Fake Reports by the Reserse & Criminal Unit Investigators to Prosecutor Rizki Andika Putra; Aryani Witasari; Deny Suwondo
Law Development Journal Vol 4, No 1 (2022): March 2022
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.4.1.108-115

Abstract

The aim of this research is to find out and analyze the process of investigating criminal acts of false reports by investigators from the Criminal Investigation Unit to the prosecutor's office. To find out and analyze the obstacles to the process of investigating criminal acts of false reports by investigators from the Criminal Investigation Unit to the prosecutor's office. To find out and analyze efforts to overcome obstacles to the process of investigating criminal acts of false reports by investigators from the Criminal Investigation Unit to the prosecutor's office. This study uses a sociological juridical approach, with descriptive analytical research specifications. The data used in this research is secondary data obtained through literature study which is then analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study are the Process of Investigating False Reports by Criminal Investigation Unit Investigators to the Prosecutor's Office is an investigator who submits a case file or the result of the report turns out to be false to the prosecutor's office, the prosecutor can return the case file or the results of the report to the investigator with instructions or directions from the prosecutor. Its office with coordination or cooperation between the police and the prosecutor's office. The resistance is the investigation of a criminal act of a false report takes a long time: in handling a criminal act of a false report by a defendant, it cannot be processed further if it only relies on information/confessions from the suspect, and if the case related to the crime of a false report has not been revealed or proven. Proving is difficult, it is difficult to prove the case in the investigation because in fact this case does not exist so that investigators must be more observant and patient in every collection of evidence. The solution is intensify every report or input from everyone about everything related to the problem of the crime of the false report. Increased awareness of new modes of crime.
The Law Enforcement on Criminal Acts of Narcotics Abuse by Child Akmadi Akmadi; Gunarto Gunarto; Deny Suwondo
Law Development Journal Vol 4, No 2 (2022): June 2022
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.4.2.%p

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine and analyze law enforcement against the crime of narcotics abuse by children. To find out and analyze the obstacles in law enforcement against the crime of narcotics abuse by children. To find out and analyze efforts to overcome the obstacles of criminal acts of narcotics abuse by children. This study used an empirical juridical approach, with descriptive research specifications. The data used in this study was secondary data obtained through literature study which was then analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study are Law Enforcement Against Criminal Acts of Narcotics Abuse by Children are The government and state institutions should provide special protection for children, and most specifically for children who are in conflict with the law and children who are victims of narcotics abuse. The problem is: Law enforcement officers or legal structures here are limited to the police, prosecutors and judges. Facilities and facilities in law enforcement are less supportive and incomplete. Community participation and control in some areas are still very low due to a sense of not caring about their own environment even though it is clearly seen directly that there are acts of narcotics abuse. The quality and quality of some police officers who work in the Res Unit are still low. The efforts are: Increased understanding of the concept of diversion with restorative justice is aimed at law enforcement officers (both for the police, prosecutors and judges). Must try to develop potential or human resources in the Res Unit. Drugs through participating in further training on narcotics and the modes in their distribution, so that in the future members of the Res Unit. Drugs have the ability and are more maximal in seeking law enforcement against narcotics crimes. Inviting all elements of society because in accordance with the law the community plays a role in handling, preventing, and distributing narcotics.
EFEKTIVITAS PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP KELALAIAN PENGEMUDI YANG MENYEBABKAN KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS Muslimin Muslimin; Deny Suwondo
Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Mahasiswa Vol 5, No 1 (2026): MARET 2026
Publisher : Jurnal Ilmiah Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Kecelakaan lalu lintas merupakan dampak buruk yang ditimbulkan oleh mobilitas transportasi yang terus meningkat, sebuah fenomena yang diperburuk oleh kurangnya infrastruktur yang memadai dan mengutamakan keselamatan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah Untuk mengetahui dan memahami efektivitas penegakan hukum terhadap kelalaian pengemudi yang menyebabkan kecelakaan lalu lintas. Untuk mengetahui dan memahami faktor-faktor yang menghambat efektivitas penegakan hukum dalam kasus kecelakaan lalu lintas akibat kelalaian dan solusinya.Metode penelitian dengan pendekatan yuridis empiris, spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif analisis. Sumber Data menggunakan data primer dan data sekunder. Metode Pengumpulan Data menggunakan wawancara dan studi kepustakaan. Analisis Data menggunakan analisis Kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa Efektivitas penegakan hukum terhadap kelalaian pengemudi yang menyebabkan kecelakaan lalu lintas menunjukkan kombinasi antara tindakan represif (penindakan) dan preventif (edukasi/penyelesaian kekeluargaan). Satlantas aktif melakukan penindakan pelanggaran kasat mata dan penanganan TKP laka lantas untuk menjaga ketertiban, terutama di titik-titik rawan. Faktor penghambatnya adalah Faktor Budaya Hukum Masyarakat (Kesadaran Hukum Rendah) meliputi Penyelesaian Kekeluargaan, Minimnya Pemahaman Hukum, Kurang Kooperatif. Faktor Teknis Penyidikan (Barang Bukti & Saksi) meliputi Kurangnya Alat Bukti dan  Kondisi TKP.  Faktor Sumber Daya Manusia (Aparat Penegak Hukum) meliputi Keterbatasan Jumlah Penyidik dan Profesionalisme. Faktor Sarana dan Prasarana meliputi Kebutuhan akan peralatan olah TKP modern yang lebih canggih untuk akurasi data laka. Faktor Infrastruktur/Lingkungan meliputi Jalan Rusak/Minim Penerangan. Solusi untuk Meningkatkan Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum adalah Optimalisasi Restorative Justice yang Terukur, Peningkatan Kompetensi Penyidik, Penguatan Edukasi Hukum dan Sosialisasi (Preventif), Penegakan Hukum Berbasis Data (E-TLE), Koordinasi dengan Instansi Terkait (Infrastruktur) dan Pendekatan Humanis (BANGKOLIS)Kata Kunci    : Efektivitas, Penegakan Hukum, Kelalaian Pengemudi, Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas