Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ius Poenale
Erny Herlin Setyorini
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Trial Proving in Electronic Criminal Case Trial Based On the Dignified Justice Perspective Novritsar Hasintongan Pakpahan; Teguh Prasetyo; Erny Herlin Setyorini; Yovita Arie Mangesti
Ius Poenale Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/ip.v3i1.2452

Abstract

Trial proving in Indonesia has always been limited to Criminal Procedural Law and other regulations. Following the recent development of electronic criminal case trials, there has not been any precise regulation aside from Supreme Court Regulation 4 of 2020. The contradiction between KUHAP and Supreme Court Regulation causes problems, especially regarding trial proving. The purpose of the paper is to provide a legal solution to the problem of the legal emptiness regarding the regulation of trial proving in electronic criminal case trials from the perspective of Dignified Justice that will provide advantageous, responsive, and adaptive justice towards the needs of the community. The methodology of this research is based on normative research. The normative research methods used in this research are the statute approach, normative approach, and comparative approach. The result showed there shouldn't be a conflict between the effect of KUHAP and Supreme Court Regulation. Yet, the regulation of trial proving in an electronic criminal trial should be regulated at a statute level.
Co-Authors Novritsar Hasintongan Pakpahan Prasetyo, Teguh