Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Implementasi Perlindungan Upah Terhadap Sengketa Wanprestasi Pekerja Bangunan di Indonesia Pradya Muharam Andika; Putu Ayu Veguita Putri Ningsih; Muhammad Arvin Wicaksono
COMSERVA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/comserva.v2i1.210

Abstract

Problems with workers/laborers still often occur in various sectors in Indonesia, from all existing sectors, the construction sector is one of the largest absorbers of labor which is a concern for workers/laborers whether their rights and obligations have been implemented and fulfilled. Of the many problems in the construction sector, there is a problem that can be said to be at the core of life rather than the workers themselves, namely wages. Why wages have become a problem that is certainly a thing of the past but is still happening today. Because wages are a right that must be obtained by a worker, especially construction workers, the economic wealth of a construction worker also depends on how great the graduates or skills are and the size of the project. Of the many cases that occurred, there were construction workers who really only relied on one project for the survival of the workers and their families. In this case there is legal protection regarding this matter and is seen from the civil aspect. From the basic agreement to the court mechanism for cases or disputes over these rights.
Ketentuan Pidana dalam Undang-Undang Perlindungan Data Pribadi: Studi Perbandingan Hukum antara Indonesia dan Singapura Dian Purwaningrum Soemitro; Muhammad Arvin Wicaksono; Nur Aini Putri
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 5 No 1: April - September 2023
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v5i1.272

Abstract

This study aims to compare the penal provisions between the PDPA and Law Number 27 of 2022. This study uses normative legal research with the statute and comparative approaches. The collected legal material is then qualitatively analyzed to describe the problem and answer study purposes. The results show a striking difference between the PDPA and Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning penal provisions related to offenses of personal data protection. The PDPA portrays a more moderate approach by establishing relatively lighter imprisonment and fines. In contrast, Law Number 27 of 2022 illustrates a stricter approach with more severe imprisonment, fines, and additional punishments. Singapore leans towards prevention and education, while Indonesia places a high priority on law enforcement. Nonetheless, both approaches ultimately aim to protect their citizens’ personal data. Therefore, it recommended that the relevant authorities in both Singapore and Indonesia continually evaluate and adapt their legal frameworks to safeguard personal data effectively. Singapore could consider stricter penalties to discourage offenses while maintaining its focus on education and prevention. On the other hand, while Indonesia’s commitment to law enforcement is commendable, it could also benefit from incorporating preventive measures and public education to promote understanding and voluntary compliance. Collaborative efforts between the two countries can facilitate continual enhancements in personal data protection within their respective jurisdictions.