H.R. Adianto Mardijono
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PEMENUHAN HAK BURUH DALAM PEMBERIAN PESANGON MENURUT PASAL 43 PERATURAN PEMERINTAH 35 TAHUN 2021 Clarisa Fitri Milenia Turnip; H.R. Adianto Mardijono
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v2i2.46

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine whether the rights of workers in providing severance pay according to article 43 of government regulation 35 of 2021. Fulfillment of rights is the obligation of every person to have rights which are everything that must be obtained by individuals because these rights are inherent in each of them. Same thing with work. It is known that government laws and regulations also limit workers and severance pay. Basically, a worker/labourer is a person who works in a company who has the right to receive an imbalance or wage from a company where he works, the company also has regulations and the government also provides regulations to employees. The company is known that the rules that have been set by the government are the ones that must be obeyed by every company. The existence of a working relationship with this company creates a working relationship between the worker and the entrepreneur that not only builds a relationship but also the company and the worker/laborer may experience termination of employment in that the worker/labourer is entitled to receive an imbalance or severance pay at the time the worker/laborer is working or at the end of the job. the relationship between the ape and the company is obliged to provide the workers' rights. In presenting these rights the company must fulfill a decent life for workers, because of the existence of laws and government regulations in order to create proper fulfillment of rights for workers/workers. The method used in this research is to use the legal and conceptual approach. In this study, it will be known whether the labor severance pay in Article 43 of Government Regulation 35 of 2021 is in accordance with the right to a decent life according to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ATAS HAK PEKERJA DALAM PERJANJIAN KONTRAK KERJA Talitha Zhafirah; H.R. Adianto Mardijono
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v3i1.176

Abstract

Wages are rewards or payments that are the rights of workers/laborers and an obligation for companies/employers. Several forms of wages take the form of daily hhwages, mmpiece wages, fixedbb wagesnn, non-fixednnwages provided by the company/employer to provide such compensation based on time and effort, performance, work performance, or services rendered by the worker/laborer. The right of workers/laborers to wages has legal protection. If wages are not paid or are paid lower than the Minimum Wage, the worker/laborer has the right to demand to be paid in accordance with the provisions of the minimum wage. Companies/employers who do not fulfill their obligations to pay appropriate wages/salaries will be subject to legal sanctions. Law enforcement on the payment of wages has been clearly regulated in Law Number 32 of 2003 concerning Manpower. The purpose of this writing is to understand the legal regulations regarding wages which are the rights of workers/laborers and the obligations of companies/employers. Using a normative juridical research method, which examines statutory regulations, legal definitions, or legal doctrines in order to answer legal problems or issues raised in this writing
Kemampuan Bertanggung Jawab Orang yang Mempunyai Gangguan Jiwa Akibat Melakukan Tindak Pidana Narkotika Fahmi Ramadhan; H.R. Adianto Mardijono
Harmonization : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Ilmu Hukum, dan Ilmu Ekonomi Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Juni
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to find out the criminal responsibility of narcotics offenders who have mental disorders. The research carried out is normative law research where secondary information is obtained by conducting bibliographical studies. The process of changing the data is then carried out in a qualitative way. The case discussed is a narcotics crime, but it was committed by a person with mental disorders within the jurisdiction of the Sumenep District Court as proven by a psychiatrist as an expert witness who works at the RSUD. Dr. H. Moh Anwar, Sumenep. In this case, which showed that the defendant with proof of a letter issued by a psychiatrist stated that the person concerned had mental and behavioral disorders due to drug addiction and residual schizophrenia, the judge did not convict or acquit the defendant for the crime of class I narcotics but ordered him to go to the Menur Mental Hospital in Surabaya or Dr. Radjiman Wediodiningrat Mental Hospital in Lawang to carry out maintenance actions. Based on that, a person who has a mental disorder commits a narcotic crime, is subject to the provisions of legal regulations in Indonesia, namely that he cannot be convicted or acquitted of all charges.