Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

IMPLEMENTASI PASAL 35 AYAT 1 HURUF C PERATURAN KAPOLRI NOMOR 9 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG SURAT IZIN MENGEMUDI BAGI DISABILITAS DAKSA Sultan Taqiyuddin Hizbillah; Widhi Cahyo Nugroho
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v2i3.80

A person with disability is given special regulation regarding the acquisition of driver's licence (driver's license) d for those who are handicapped in driving traffic. The study aims to find out how section 35 verses (Lala 1234)1 letter c works the 2012 sheriff's rule number 9 on driver's license for disability. In practicee there are still obstacles andoobstacles in the processoof obtaining the driver's license d, so someoof them stillodo not have the d's licenseoto drive. The goal to beoachieved in thisostudy is: 1) to know the application of article 35 verse 1 letter c of the 2012 chief's law no. 9 on the driver's license for disabilities. 2) to know the physical criteria applied to those with disabilities to have a driver's licence. Thisotype of study can be classified as normatization studies because through legislation approaches and study on disability behaviors gained driver's license D and obstaclesoin the process. Theoresearch site is at stone city p.d. Data collecting uses a technique interview with informants related to the research being researched. Further data results in qualitative analysis to provide exposure to research. Theodata analysis used by the writer as a qualitative descriptiveomethod is aodescription in the regular,o coherent, logical, and effectivee form of sentences. Based on the results of studies, section 35 clause 1 letter c of the 2012 chief's rule no. 9 on driver's license is still underwriting because of some obstacle factor, oneoof which is theolack of knowledge of theo perpetrators of the traffic rule.

INVESTASI ILEGAL BERKEDOK ROBOT TRADING MENURUT HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA Mohamamd Farosi; Widhi Cahyo Nugroho
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v2i1.152

In this modern era, there have been many developments in human life both in the economic and technological fields. In the economic field one of the developments that can be seen is a form of investment. Investment today can be done using technology. As for stocks, forex and crypto where you can implemented in a practical manner. Many people are interested in investing because it is facilitated by using software. The large public interest in investing is used as a field by criminals. The modus operandi used is by packaging modern investments with the use of trading robots. Regarding the regulations regarding investment actually contained in Law No. 25 of 2007 concerning Investment. However, the Law does not contain criminal penalties and regulations regarding fraud by using technology in investing. The true element of fraud is contained in Article 378 of the Criminal Code which, if related to illegal investment cases under the guise of robot tra ding will be found one of the elements that has not been fulfilled. So it can be concluded that regulations regarding investment activities using trading robots in Indonesia have not been regulated explicitly. Meanwhile, regulations for the use of technology are regulated in Law Number 19 of 2016 Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronics. The law also does not contain regulations regarding investment using technology, only regulations regarding electronic transactions. has not been explicitly regulated, researchers will discuss and analyze criminal acts in this case. in Indonesia

PREDATORY PRICING PROMO OJEK ONLINE DALAM PRESEPEKTIF HUKUM PESAING USAHA R.Bima Avriliano Dody B.A.P; Widhi Cahyo Nugroho
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v3i1.187

In today's modern era, many people in general use and take advantage of the sophistication of communication technology, especially in the field of business economics, one of which is online motorcycle taxi transportation. online motorcycle taxis are gojek, gojek has many promos that are applied such as discounted prices, promo vouchers, and many more. and in this case predatory pricing contradicts Article 20 of Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. The formulation of the problem in this research are: 1.) What are the legal consequences (predatory pricing) that arise from the perspective of business competition law? , 2.) Are the promos of online motorcycle taxi applicators not in conflict with the concept of predatory pricing in business law competition?. The conclusions obtained are, firstly, the Gojek promo contradicts the concept of predatory pricing in business competition, because it must be distinguished between promotional activities in business activities and the concept of price fixing which is prohibited in business competition law. is a program of a special offer company in the short term to determine the promotion of related consumers in order to make a faster purchasing decision. Sales promotion is a supporting activity of advertising. After and get information from a product, consumers will be more interested and interested in the decision after getting a special offer to see what is offered from the product or service

TINJAUAN YURIDIS MENGENAI KEKERASAN PADA PEREMPUAN DALAM KEJAHATAN CYBERCRIME Mochammad Rifky Syahrian; Widhi Cahyo Nugroho
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v3i1.216

All human actions in the current digital era are substantially supported by the internet's presence in daily life. Nevertheless, the development of technology and the usage of the internet, among other factors, have led to the creation of cybercrime. Cybercrime demands unique handling by the police during the investigation process due to its evolution. Due to this, this study will evaluate the hectic nature of the cybercrime investigation process utilizing normative juridical research. The method is essentially the same as the criminal investigation process in general, with the exception that cyber units or special units charged with investigating cybercrime carry out the inquiry. Although the harm inflicted by cybercrime is incalculable, Indonesia's law that deals with it expressly isn't yet up and running. Although they cannot be used to all sorts of cybercrime crimes that exist, some provisions of the Criminal Code (KUHP) can be utilized to catch criminals connected to computers or the internet. Women are the victims of online gender-based violence (OGBV), a type of cybercrime. The need for legal protection for OGBV victims is critical. Both the trafficking law (Law No. 21/2007), the pornography law (Law No. 44/2008), which governs guidance, assistance, social recovery, as well as the physical and mental health of children who are pornography victims or perpetrators, and which also regulates restitution (Article 48), health rehabilitation, social rehabilitation, repatriation, and social reintegration, control the legal safeguards for those who experience internet aggression against women (Article 16). In light of this, how was Indonesian law addressing and protecting against women being abused through cybercrime or internet networks while this piece was being written?

PERAN KPPU DALAM MELINDUNGI KONSUMEN DARI PELAKU USAHA TIDAK SEHAT Nofita Ariyanti; Widhi Cahyo Nugroho
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v3i1.222

The KPPU was established in 2000 based on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Trade Competition No. 5 of 1999. The background to the creation of the KPPU is the desire to protect consumers from predatory pricing and other forms of market abuse as well as stimulating a dynamic and competitive market. In exercising its functions, the KPPU has the power to monitor compliance with the prohibition of unsound business practices regulated by Law no. 5 of 1999. In its own review of allegations of monopolistic behavior and anti-competitive tactics, the KPPU only requests a report. This survey has been prepared to monitor activities that violate the Unethical Business Practices Act No. 5 of 1999. Whether the complaint comes from the KPPU or from the general public, all are investigated. The purpose of this study is to determine the function of KPPU in protecting consumers against predatory pricing. Using regulatory and conceptual approaches, as well as normative legal research methods, this study examines how the KPPU protects consumers from unfair pricing. The results of the investigation show that the KPPU is empowered to examine corporate figures suspected of carrying out a monopoly strategy

PROSEDUR JUAL BELI SAHAM YANG GO PUBLIC TETAPI TERHAPUS DARI BURSA EFEK Nabila Auliawati; Widhi Cahyo Nugroho
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v3i2.276

The progress of the world economy in the field of investment is very much driving changes in life. One of them is investing in stock products on the capital market that can bring profit opportunities, but can also support the country's economic growth, maintain inflation stability that has occurred this year, not only that, but economic financing to the community has been extended by all levels. Basically, companies that go public that are open to the capital market have high returns, which are also subject to the risks they face. It is important for the government to provide legal certainty that is useful for protecting the interests of society. In investing, there are bankruptcy risks that are unexpected by investors. With the aim of this writing to fulfill the buying and selling procedures when issuers go bankrupt which investors are worried about in bankruptcy in companies that go public in terms of bankruptcy law. With the procedure carried out, it gives investors the right to be given back from the results of the investment made. The result in the bankruptcy of the issuer going public has an impact on the shares owned by investors in a company going public, namely being able to get the risk of loss, namely loss of capital caused by not being able to sell shares of certain investments which affect the delisting process by the stock exchange. There are many cases when a company is removed from stock going public which results in investors losing their investment in the company. In this condition, investors can provide legal protection at this time by taking preventive measures or carrying out judicial matters, namely civil lawsuits can be carried out through assistance from the OJK or by submitting their own submissions to court institutions by investors as shareholders of companies going public

TINJAUAN YURIDIS PERNIKAHAN BEDA AGAMA (STUDI KASUS PERKARA NO.650/PDT.P/2022/PN.JKT SEL.) Renaning Galih Alif Nugrahani; Widhi Cahyo Nugroho
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v3i2.281

Interfaith marriages has given rise to many interpretations regarding the validity of interfaith marriages in Indonesia, especially in Jakarta Selatan. In Indonesia, interfaith marriages are not regulated in a marriage law that applies in Indonesia. Trhe is a legal difference between the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic Indonesia which grants permission to carry out interfaith marriages and the Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia which rejects interfaith marriages. This study uses a normative juridical aspproach, in this research uses descriptive analytical research specifications, The data collection in this study used a literature study where the results of the research indicated that the Jurisprudence of the Jakarta Selatan District Court Case Study No.650/Pdt.P/2022/PN.Jkt Sel. used the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No.1400k/Pdt/1986,etc. Also theis have own point of view in addressing legal conflicts the registration of interfaith marriages. In this case the judge also has a different perspective in deiding a case can handling, especially in the case ofminterfaith marriages.

PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA ORANG TUA YANG MELAKUKAN EKSPLOITASI ANAK Maulana Syarif Hidayatullah; Widhi Cahyo Nugroho
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v3i2.307

Children are the nation's next generation who should be protected by various parties starting from the smallest environment, namely the family, society, government and the state. The responsibility of parents who exploit children and how to handle those carried out by parents and children who become victims. Crimes committed against children as victims often occur but society does not respond to these crimes so that in the end these crimes are considered reasonable, especially if they are committed by parents of the child. The crime that is often committed by parents against their biological children is deliberately neglecting the method used in this research, which is a type of empirical legal research that aims to find out how far the law works in society. primary and secondary needs of the child. Basically neglect of children is included in social violence which causes psychological and physical injuries and of course it is very imprinted in the memory of children who are victims of this neglect. Neglect of these children is a prelude to exploitation with the modus operandi of making biological children as beggars and buskers in order to meet the needs of family life which should not be the responsibility of a child in the family. Actors who make children as beggars and buskers are the smallest unit in society, namely people Old. Criminal liability for people who intentionally exploit children economically with the modus operandi of making these children become beggars and buskers is regulated in Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection

Title

Found 8 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 8 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 8 Documents
Search