Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris
Papang Sapari
Dosen Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Iblam
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
UPAYA HUKUM PENINJAUAN KEMBALI OLEH TERPIDANA DALAM KUHAP YANG BOLEH DI AJUKAN DUA KALI Papang Sapari
The Juris Vol 4 No 2 (2020): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v4i2.207

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out what is the reason for the filing of a criminal case review (PK) and how the arrangements for a judicial review (PK) in the Criminal Procedure Code can be filed twice. Using the normative juridical research method, Constitutional Court Decision No. 34 / PUU-XI / 2013 has opened a PK room not only once as regulated so far by Criminal Procedure Code/KUHAP, Article 268 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code so that PK can be carried out many times as long as a novum is found and filed even though the previous PK has been carried out. Responding to the Constitutional Court Decision, the Supreme Court issued SEMA No.7 of 2014 concerning Submission of Petitions for Reconsideration in Criminal Cases. Through this SEMA, the Supreme Court reminded that the provisions of the PK only once outside of Article 268 of the Criminal Procedure Code were canceled by the Constitutional Court, therefore PK criminal cases (in the same case) which were declared unacceptable more than 1 (once).
Co-Authors