Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
I Rahma S
Departemen Pendidikan Fisika, Sekolah Pasca Sarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Education Immunology & microbiology Mathematics Physics

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Creative, critical and argumentative scientific skills on the concept of fluid dynamics: Case study on Vocational High School students R Fauziah; I Rahma S; S Feranie
International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Vol 3 (2018): Promoting 21st Century Skills Through Mathematics and Science Education
Publisher : Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (352.581 KB)

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the scient ific skill in creat ive thinking,crit ical thinking andargumentation thinking of vocational High School students in Tangerang district on the dynamicfluid concept. This research used case study and description analysis by using instrumental such ascreative, crit ical and argumentation scient ific skills. The participant of this research were 33students from nint h-grade of TSM this one of SMK Tangerang Regency. The instrument used inthis research were one case consisted of 4 creature scient ific thinking indicators with a reliabilit yvalue of 0.87 and belonging to the high category and one case consisted of 4 scient ific argumentativeabilit y wit h a reliabilit y value of 0.7 and sufficient category. The result of this research showed thatthe students' average score of creative scient ific t hinking on dynamic fluid was 34,14 frommaximum score 100, so they were in low category. The average of students' crit ical thinking was24,5 from the maximum score and they were in the low category. However, the average of thestudents' argumentative abilit y was 43,67 from maximum score 100 and the were in the lowcategory.
Co-Authors R Fauziah S Feranie