Agung Pranoto Kadiatmaja
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Hang Tuah Surabaya

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Error Analysis in Students’ Writing Composition Agung Pranoto Kadiatmaja
Jurnal Al-Fawa'id : Jurnal Agama dan Bahasa Vol 11 No 1 (2021): Maret
Publisher : STAI Ali bin Abi Thalib Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2018.064 KB) | DOI: 10.54214/alfawaid.Vol11.Iss1.151

Abstract

To recognize the students’ difficulties, this research analyzes errors in Students’ writing composition of Passive Voice. This study of error (error analysis) is part of an investigation of the process of English language learning. This research is to find the types of error analysis in students’ writing composition and to find the most dominant types of error analysis in students’ writing composition of passive voice. This research is qualitatively accomplished to look into errors in the second language acquisition. This research focused on the qualitative research by using document analysis to collect empirical data from the students’ writing. This method is applied to get the accurate data collection. The object of the research is students’ writing composition randomly taken from sixteen ESP students of Strata 1 – Arabic Department of STAI Ali bin Abi Thalib Surabaya. The researcher investigates more details by using surface strategy taxonomy to get the result of this error analysis. It is limited on the students’ passive sentences error in writing composition consisting of four error types: omission, addition, misformation, and misordering. Finally, after identifying the entire data and analyzing the research findings, it can be summarized that the types of passive voice errors produced by the students are (1) omission that occurred 24 times or 51,06% of all, (2) addition that occurred 15 times or 31,96% of all, (3) misordering that occurred 5 times or 10,64% of all, and (4) misformation that occurred 3 times or 6,38% of all. According to the research findings, the most dominant type of passive voice error is omission.
An Analysis Of Students’ Sentences With Inverted Subjects And Verbs Error Found In Tmi’s Toefl Preparation Class Agung Pranoto Kadiatmaja
Jurnal Al-Fawa'id : Jurnal Agama dan Bahasa Vol 11 No 2 (2021): September
Publisher : STAI Ali bin Abi Thalib Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2766.695 KB) | DOI: 10.54214/alfawaid.Vol11.Iss2.166

Abstract

The research is to find out the types of error analysis in students’ sentences and the most dominant types of error analysis in students’ sentences. This research uses qualitative method to look into errors in the second language acquisition and to collect empirical data. This method is applied to get the accurate data collection. The object of the research is students’ practice randomly taken from twelve advanced students of TOEFL Preparation Class – The Mushlih Institute (TMI) Surabaya. In acquiring the result of this error analysis, surface strategy taxonomy is applied to investigate more details. It is limited on the students’ sentences with inverted subjects and verbs error in their practice consisting of four error types. In summary, the types of sentences with inverted subjects and verbs errors produced by the students are (1) omission appearing 49 times or 79,03% of all, (2) addition appearing 9 times or 14,52% of all, (3) misordering appearing 3 times or 4,84% of all, and (4) misformation appearing a time or 1,61% of all. According to the research findings, the most dominant type of sentences with inverted subjects and verbs error is omission.