Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Seminar Nasional Hasil Riset dan Pengabdian (SNHRP)
Ro’ifah
English Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya
Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Iteration Analysis of Reading Materials in ELT Book, Developing English Competencies 3: (Analisis Pengulangan Kata Materi Ajar Membaca dalam Buku Ajar Bahasa Inggris, Developing English Competencies 3) Ro’ifah
SNHRP Vol. 2 (2019): Seminar Nasional Hasil Riset dan Pengabdian (SNHRP) Ke 2 Tahun 2019
Publisher : LPPM Universitas PGRI Adi Buana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (585.137 KB)

Abstract

Learning a language is fundamental and deeply dependent on vocabulary. To be selective in learning materials, especially reading texts presented in the textbooks used in the learning process in the classroom is very important for success of learning. The materials of ELT (English Language Teaching) books are supposed to provide sufficient quantity and range of words, vocabulary improvement, and strategies for self-learning. But, this study is focused only on the lexical units introduced in the reading texts. Two problems are questioned to figure out the lexical items of the reading materials presented in the ELT book: how many lexical units consider the most frequent words in English corpora and how many lexical units are presented in rehearsal or iteration. Descriptive quantitative methodology was used to research an e-book, Developing English Competencies 3, which the corpus became the object in this study. Observation and computational tool; RANGE and FREQUENCY, were applied as the instrument to make easier counting and analyzed by comparing to general frequency list. It was found that the book was clearly unbalanced about the amount and distribution throughout the three ranges. Then, the opportunities for repetitive practice were very poor. Many frequent words did not fit the English general scale of frequency.
Co-Authors