Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Register : Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning of FBS UNIMED
Anggi Ridho Habibi
UNIVERSITAS HARAPAN MEDAN
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
GRAMMATICAL ERRORS IN THESIS ABSTRACT OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT STUDENTS OF UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA Anggi Ridho Habibi; Zuindra Zuindra
REGISTER: Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed Vol 10, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (361.688 KB) | DOI: 10.24114/reg.v10i1.24679

Abstract

GRAMMATICAL ERRORS IN THESIS ABSTRACT OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERINGDEPARTMENT STUDENTS OF UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARAAnggi Ridho Habibi1, Zuindra2Universitas Harapan MedanJl. HM. Joni No.70 C, Teladan Bar., Kec. Medan Kota, Kota Medan, Sumatera Utara, 20216, IndonesiaEmail: anggiridhohabibi@gmail.com, zuindraidris@gmail.comAbstractThis research focused on the grammatical errors found in the undergraduate thesis abstracts ofIndustrial Engineering Department Students of Universitas Sumatera Utara. There are three problemsand objectives formulated in this study that focused on finding out the types, process of analyzing, andthe most dominant type of grammatical error occurred in the thesis abstract. This research is adescriptive qualitative study that examined the thesis abstracts using the steps of error analysisproposed by Ellis and Barkhuizen (2005). The grammatical errors are classified into the 4 types ofgrammatical errors proposed by Dulay, Burt, and Krashen (1982), which are addition, omission,misformation, and misordering. The results showed that there were 143 errors found from the 24 thesisabstracts that being sampled. Omission is the most dominant type of grammatical error with 67 errors(47%), followed by misformation with 35 errors (25%), addition with 29 errors (20%), and misorderingwith 12 errors (8%).Keywords: grammar, types, error, error analysis, abstract
Co-Authors