Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT Science Midwifery Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Aufa (JPMA)
Eliya Wardayani
Akademi Kebidanan Sentral
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Dentistry Education Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Veterinary Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Science Midwifery

 1 
The effectiveness of the SQ3R and SQ4R methods on complementary therapy during pregnancy on student learning outcomes in Akademi Kebidanan Sentral Padang Sidempuan 2022 Eliya Wardayani
Science Midwifery Vol 11 No 2 (2023): June: Midwifery and Health Sciences
Publisher : Institute of Computer Science (IOCS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/midwifery.v11i2.1297

Abstract

Learning models that can be applied to improve students' ability to learn texts are the SQ3R (survey, question, read, recite, review) and SQ4R (survey, question, read, reflect, recite, review) learning models. These two methods are almost the same because SQ4R is a development of the SQ3R method. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the SQ3R and SQ4R methods on complementary therapy material in pregnancy at the Padang Sidempuan Central Midwifery Academy in 2022. This study used a pre-experiment design with one group pretest-postest. The population was all midwifery study program students of the Sentral Padang Sidempuan Midwifery Academy. Sampling was carried out using purposive sampling technique on second semester students because second semester students were receiving Complementary Midwifery Care courses. Comparison of student learning outcomes using the SQ3R and SQ4R methods, SQ4R, SQ3R and without using the SQ3R and SQ4R methods shows that "F" count (28.987) is greater than "F" table (2.99). This means that the use of the SQ3R and SQ4R methods, and the SQ4R method is more effective than the use of the SQ3R method and without the use of the SQ3R and SQ4R methods.
Co-Authors