Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Progresif DE JURE Jurnal Konstitusi
Hamdan Zoelva
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
RELASI ISLAM, NEGARA, DAN PANCASILA DALAM PERSPEKTIF TATA HUKUM INDONESIA Zoelva, Hamdan
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 4, No 2: Desember 2012
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (375.023 KB) | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v4i2.2980

Abstract

There aredifferences of opinion in looking at the relationship between religion and state. Some proposed that the state should be based on religion (Islam) and others have argued the opposite, the state should be separated from the religion (secular nationalism). The debate is considered complete after the Jakarta Charter formula was agreed, although it was annulled after the legalization of the Constitution on August 18, 1945. History shows that Muslims sacrifice for this country is invaluable both in terms of physical struggle (body and soul) and ideological (Islamic values). So that, returning authority to the Muslim community to determine the direction of development of the country has become a necessity. Through this article, the author would like to express a new form of moral calling on Muslims to contribute to this country, some of them with sincerity impose Islamic lawinto national law. Terdapat perbedaan pendapat dalam memandang hubungan agama dan negara. Ada yang berpendapat negara  harus  berdasarkan  pada  agama  (Islam)  dan  ada  yang  berpendapat sebaliknya,  bahwa negara  harus  dipisah  dari  agama  (nasionalisme  sekuler).  Perdebatan dianggap selesai setelah disepakati rumusan Piagam Jakarta, meskipun kemudian dianulir setelah  disahkannya  UUD  tanggal  18  Agustus  1945.  Sejarah  ini  menunjukkan  bahwa pengorbanan umat Islam untuk negeri ini tidak ternilai harganya baik ditinjau dari segi perjuangan fisik (jiwa raga) maupun ideologis (nilai-nilai keislaman). Dari pengorbanan tersebut,  mengembalikan  kewenangan  kepada  umat Islam  untuk  menentukan  arah pembangunan negara ini menjadi keniscayaan. Karena itu melalui tema ini, penulis ingin mengungkapkan bentuk baru panggilan moral umat Islam untuk memberikan konstribusi terhadap negeri ini, yaitu diantaranya melalui keikhlasan memberlakukan hukum Islam ke dalam hukum nasional.
Problematika Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pemilukada oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Zoelva, Hamdan
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 10, No 3 (2013)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (601.661 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk%x

Abstract

When local election is stated as a part of the regime of general election law based on Article 236C of Law No. 12 Year 2008 on Local Government, the authority to settle the dispute on it was transferred from the Supreme Court to Constitutional Court. In the course of its development, the authority of the Court to decide local election dispute does not lie on textual interpretation only which merely rules on  the dispute concerning the result of the election but also on the violations which happened during the election process. It is the constitutional obligation  of  the Court which basically has the purpose to ensure that fair and just election can be held. In practice, lots of problems arose in the organization of the election either concerning regulation, organization or law enforcement. From the Court side, lots  of challenges and obstacles are also faced in settling election dispute. However, that situation does not deter the Court from making legal breakthrough to mend and improve local election system. The steps taken by the Constitutional Court precisely become inevitable and show to a greater extent its character as a court  for constitutional matters with the authority to enforce law and justice as stipulated by  the Constitution.
PEMBAHARUAN SISTEM PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN KONSEP PRISMATIKA HUKUM Arifudin, Arifudin; Zoelva, Hamdan
Jurnal Hukum Progresif Vol 10, No 2 (2022): Oktober 2022
Publisher : Doctoral of Law Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jhp.10.2.127-140

Abstract

Presidential threshold merupakan persyaratan bagi partai atau gabungan partai politik yang akan mengusung calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden dalam pemilu. Namun, Presidential threshold perlu dilakukan pembaharuan melalui konsep prismatika hukum agar memiliki dampak pada kualitas demokrasi. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui dinamika pengaturan presidential threshold; kelemahan pengaturan presidential threshold; dan pembaharuan sistem presidential threshold di Indonesia berdasarkan konsep prismatika hukum. Hasil pembahasan dengan metode penelitian yuridis normatif ini adalah dinamika presidential threshold terdapat pada besaran prosentase perolehan kursi di DPR atau suara sah secara nasional. Kelemahan presidential threshold yaitu terbukanya peluang otoritaririanisme dan praktik oligarki dalam berdemokrasi. Sedangkan pembaharuan sistem presidential threshold melalui konsep prismatika hukum dapat dikonstruksikan dengan memadukan unsur kuantitas dan kualitas dalam pencalonan presiden dan wakil presiden.
Co-Authors Arifudin arifudin