Aji Titin Roswitha Nursanthy
Dosen STIH Awang Long Samarinda

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Problematika Perkawinan Beda Agama Menurut Uu No.1 Tahun 1974 Maria Anna Liwa; Aji Titin Roswitha Nursanthy; Muhammad Japri
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol 1 No 1 (2018): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (100.389 KB)

Abstract

Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage in Article 2 paragraph (1): Marriage is legal if it is carried out according to the law of each religion and belief. Means the Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974 has not yet confirmed the regulation of interfaith marriages. The tendency to close, make it difficult, or obscure the implementation of community aspirations for interfaith marriage is considered by some to be contrary to the Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974. In Article 6 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law no. 1 of 1974 states "Marriage is based on the agreement of the two prospective brides" The firmness which states that the basis of marriage is the agreement of the bride and groom, can be interpreted as a form of respect for Human Rights (HAM) based on human dignity. The author uses a normative juridical approach, because of his approach, this model of legal research is called normative legal research.
Tinjauan Yuridis Proses Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Kode Etik Notaris Di Kota Samarinda Aji Titin Roswitha Nursanthy; Alex Chandra; Kadarudin; Eli Tri Kursiswanti
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol 3 No 1 (2020): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (188.003 KB) | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v3i1.173

Abstract

The problems in this research are: a juridical review of the completion of the Notary code of ethics in Samarinda City and the obstacles and solutions to the completion of the Notary code of ethics in Samarinda City. The method used by researchers is a juridical empirical legal approach and the specifications in this study include descriptive analytical. The source and type of data of this research are primary data obtained from field studies by interviewing a notary in Samarinda City. Notaries who commit errors against ethics, appropriateness or moral solutions not only according to the code of ethics alone but also based on statutory regulations. Everything that is not allowed to be done by a notary clearly and is regulated in the regulations. Obstacles in the process of completing the Notary code of ethics in Samarinda City are the large number of Notaries, with a large working area, a lack of awareness of Notaries to comply with the code of ethics, and the provision that the Notary receives is not sufficient while attending education, and overlapping provisions of the code of ethics supervision between the Honorary Council and the Notary Supervisory Council. Meanwhile, for the Supervisory Council, namely the unavailability of a representative secretariat, lack of budget funds to carry out optimal supervision and guidance, lack of government attention / concern, and weak morals/ behavior of Notaries in implementing UUJN and the Notary's Code of Ethics.