Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Desentralisasi Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi
Sait Abdullah
School of Administration, the National Institute of Public Administration
Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
DESENTRALISASI : KONSEP, TEORI DAN PERDEBATANNYA M.Pol.Admin, Sait Abdullah
Jurnal Desentralisasi Vol 6 No 4 (2005): Jurnal Desentralisasi Vol.6 No.4 Tahun 2005
Publisher : Pusat Pelatihan dan Pengambangan dan Kajian Desentralisasi dan Otonomi Daerah Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (253.285 KB)

Abstract

Definisi desentralisasi menjelaskan bahwa sebagai konsep, ternyata desentralisasi mempuyai berbagai bentuk seperti dekonsentrasi, delegasi maupun devolusi.Gelombang demokratisasi, good governance dan globalisasi telah menjadikan desentralisasi sebagai tuntutan besar bukan hanya bagi negara-negara maju tapijuga negara-negara berkembang
WHO HAS GOT WHAT?, WHY? AND HOW?: THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF REINTEGRATION POLICY IN ACEH Abdullah, Sait
Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi Vol 16, No 2 (2019): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31113/jia.v16i2.515

Abstract

Abstract This article focuses on the power relations between elite and non-elite former GAM (Gerakan Aceh Merdeka) combatants in the post conflict reintegration policy in Aceh. A number of scholars have linked the post conflict reintegration to the GAM ex-commanders conflicts over predatory processes of resource appropriation. However what is missing in their account is that the attentions to the rank and file ex-fighters, including women ex-combatants. The finding of the study suggests that the post conflict reintegration has provided opportunities for the former GAM commanders to build and consolidate their political and economic power. Since the former GAM commanders occupied the reconstruction space, they have captured the peace building processes through their predatory behaviour and patrimonial networks. In this context, the ex-commanders GAM elite has become a new dominant post conflict group  while the non-elite group of the rank and file ex-combatants, particularly women ex-combatants, lost opportunities to enhance their welfare. As local elites are powerful, they have the capacity to select who are excluded from and included in their alliances. In these circumstances, the welfare outcomes from post conflict reintegration will beframed in terms of ?who has got what??, ?why??,and ?how??.
WHO HAS GOT WHAT?, WHY? AND HOW?: The Political Economy of Reintegration Policy in Aceh Sait Abdullah
Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi Vol 16, No 2 (2019): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31113/jia.v16i2.515

Abstract

This article focuses on the power relations between former GAM (Gerakan Aceh Merdeka) elite and non elite in the post conflict reintegration policy in Aceh. A number of scholars have linked the post conflict reintegration to the GAM ex-commanders conflicts over predatory processes of resource appropriation. However, what is missing in their account is that the attentions to the rank and file ex-fighters, including female ex-combatants. The finding of the study suggests that the post conflict reintegration has provided opportunities for the former GAM commanders to build and consolidate their political and economic power. Since the former GAM commanders occupied the reconstruction space, they have captured the peace building processes through their predatory behaviour and patrimonial networks. In this context, the ex- commanders GAM elite has become a new dominant post conflict group while the non-elite group of the rank and file ex-combatants, particularly women ex- combatants, lost opportunities to enhance their welfare. As local elites are powerful, they have the capacity to select who are excluded from and included in their alliances. In these circumstances, the welfare outcomes from post conflict reintegration will be framed in terms of 'who has got what?', 'why?',and 'how?'.
WHO HAS GOT WHAT?, WHY? AND HOW?: The Political Economy of Reintegration Policy in Aceh Sait Abdullah
Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi Vol. 16 No. 2 (2019): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31113/jia.v16i2.515

Abstract

This article focuses on the power relations between former GAM (Gerakan Aceh Merdeka) elite and non elite in the post conflict reintegration policy in Aceh. A number of scholars have linked the post conflict reintegration to the GAM ex-commanders conflicts over predatory processes of resource appropriation. However, what is missing in their account is that the attentions to the rank and file ex-fighters, including female ex-combatants. The finding of the study suggests that the post conflict reintegration has provided opportunities for the former GAM commanders to build and consolidate their political and economic power. Since the former GAM commanders occupied the reconstruction space, they have captured the peace building processes through their predatory behaviour and patrimonial networks. In this context, the ex- commanders GAM elite has become a new dominant post conflict group while the non-elite group of the rank and file ex-combatants, particularly women ex- combatants, lost opportunities to enhance their welfare. As local elites are powerful, they have the capacity to select who are excluded from and included in their alliances. In these circumstances, the welfare outcomes from post conflict reintegration will be framed in terms of 'who has got what?', 'why?',and 'how?'.
Co-Authors