Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Power Sharing Between Peace and Conflict Times: A Case Study of LIBERIA Taha Shabbir
PINISI Discretion Review Volume 5, Issue 1, September 2021
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/pdr.v5i1.24095

Abstract

Power-sharing is an effective way to end the conflict, but an ineffective way to build peace. What impact do power-sharing institutions established as part of civil war settlements have on the establishment of the rule of law in post-civil war states? We argue that power-sharing policies aid the development of the rule of law in two ways. For starters, they provide a kind of institutional restriction that supports judicial authority and independence. Second, they instill a feeling of security among judges and other political actors, which strengthens their commitment to the rule of law. Through an examination of post–civil war nations between 1948 and 2006, we show the possibility of a positive connection between power sharing and the rule of law. Our results indicate that civil war settlements may aid in the establishment of the rule of law if they contain measures targeted at assuaging political players' fears in the post conflict environment.  Contrary to popular belief, it may even harm the peace effort. For certain instances, the regional level is over-emphasized, while for others, it is romanticized. Regardless, centralized policies, the development of centralized balances of power, and the history of spatial-political connections all help contribute to a centralized system. This recognition of local monopolies of power (as opposed to local balance, which occurs when power is divided between several factions) may alleviate a security problem for rebel groups, persuading them to lay down their weapons. We differentiate two types of local power-sharing in the rest of this article: local balances of power and the juxtaposition of local monopolies of power.
A Critical Study about the Human Rights Concerns in the Kashmir Valley Taha Shabbir; Zafar Ali; Shuja Uddin; Mohsin Wazir; Muhammad Ali Gopang
HUMAN: South Asian Journal of Social Studies Vol 1, No 1 (2021): Human: South Asean Journal of Social Studies
Publisher : HUMAN: South Asian Journal of Social Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (615.409 KB) | DOI: 10.26858/human.v1i1.20586

Abstract

While the United Nations is authorized to impose final remedies in Kashmir, it has limited itself to making recommendations in the hope of achieving a just and impartial settlement acceptable to all parties to the dispute. This thesis will do an observational examination of the different proposals, utilizing this accurate and positivist assessment of the United Nations' behavior as a case study. To resolve the Kashmir situation, the Security Council must substantiate the following hypothesis: Any decision or omission took by the United Nations Security Council was motivated by a desire to maintain a negotiated stalemate between India and Pakistan, a kind of status quo, before all remaining issues, whether factual or legal, are settled by direct negotiations between the two disputing parties. The United Nations took action after concluding that it could not resolve the issues under the circumstances, partly due to the conflicting positions and aspirations of the Kashmir dispute's parties and partly due to the UN system's shortcomings. From a positivist perspective, this study will aim to include an empirical examination of the United Nations' actions in settling an international dispute. It will assist in dispelling common misconceptions regarding the United Nations' status, which I assume are the product of an excessively positive or overly pessimistic appraisal of the UN's capacity and belief of its own will to enact a specific solution situation. I will attempt to explain in the concluding chapter of this study why I believe the United Nations is vital to global security, including in its handling of the Kashmir dispute. I am well aware that scholars and leaders in India and Pakistan will almost certainly cast doubt on my primary theory. This is fair since their active involvement in the issue will easily skew their perception of the UN's role. All also threatened the UN with a rejection of "fairness and impartiality," which is unsurprising. Additionally, they ultimately rejected the most, if not all, United Nations proposals owing to their inability to fulfill their demands. The Kashmir dispute did not begin with India's "invasion" of Kashmir or its protest to the UN Security Council. 
Organizational Politics and Media Employee Performance during COVID-19 Taha Shabbir; Abdul Sattar Khokar; Nabiha Khan; Arsalan Khan
Jurnal Office Volume 7, Number 2, July-December 2021
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/jo.v7i2.24047

Abstract

Many people have spoken about organizational politics about corporate well-being. Employee performance is examined in the context of the COVID-19 epidemic as a result of high-performance work practices (training, empowerment, and incentives). The findings suggest that the chosen high-performance work practices of media employees during COVID-19 had a poor association. Having a negative association with performance nullifies the current evidence of empowerment. Public media administrators must design standard operating practices that take into account the current upheavals. Performance may be improved by using organizational resources and time in a manner that fosters trust between the employer and the employee. The links are examined in the context of the fourth industrial revolution. While studying high-performance work practices and media worker performance in a developing nation, this is a novel addition. The result shows a lack of trust among the media employees, which might lead to the abuse of authority. As a result, media organizations must put in place sufficient checks and balances before empowering their staff. Since the recent epidemic of COVID-19, employees may be more inclined to take advantage of the technology development.