This Author published in this journals
All Journal SASI
Dezonda Rosiana Pattipawae
Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana Universitas Borobudur

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Era Otonomi Dezonda Rosiana Pattipawae
SASI Vol 25, No 1 (2019): Volume 25 Nomor 1, Januari - Juni 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v25i1.151

Abstract

The execution of the State Administrative Court Decision which has permanent legal force (inkracht van Gewijsde) in the era of autonomy is as wide as possible, and begins with the breakdown of the paradigm of regional autonomy in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Article 18, Article 18A and Article 18B, the implementation of regional government is based on the principles that become the normative basis. State Administrative Court decisions that cannot be executed have caused pessimism and apathy in society. The problem is that there is no executive power in the Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning the Regulation of State Administration. This condition is an alarming fact that the existence of a State Administrative Court Decision has not been able to bring justice to the public in the administrative sphere of government. The principle of the existence of a State Administrative Court Decision, to place judicial control in the implementation of good governance becomes biased in the Indonesian constitutional system.
Penetapan Waktu Pelaksanaan Banding Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Pada Daerah Karakteristik Wilayah Kepulauan Dezonda Rosiana Pattipawae
SASI Vol 24, No 2 (2018): Volume 24 Nomor 2, Juli - Desember 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v24i2.133

Abstract

The party that makes a legal appeal against the case that has been decided by the State Administrative Court is limited by the time to file an appeal to the High Administrative Court. This as stipulated in the provisions of Article 123 of Act Number 5 of 1986 which stipulates the time for legal appeal against the decision of the State Administrative Court is 14 days after the court decision is notified to him legally Determination of 14 (fourteen) times to submit an appeal for parties who are dissatisfied or accept the decision of the State Administrative Court as stipulated in the Provisions of Article 123 of Act Number 5 of 1986 which at the time the decision of the State Administrative Court was read out was not present at the hearing stipulated in the provisions of Article 108 paragraph (2) of Law Number 5 of 1986 and residing in an archipelago such as Maluku Province which has a large area and consists of islands, greatly affects the fulfillment of the timeliness determined to file an appeal . It has an impact on the effectiveness of setting 14 (fourteen) days as the deadline for filing an appeal law. Accordingly, based on these conditions, the stipulation of 14 (fourteen) days to file an appeal law is not effectively applied to regions that are characterized by islands. Only effective in areas with continental characteristics.
Tinjauan Eksekusi Putusan Sela Dalam Bentuk Schorsing Pada Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dezonda Rosiana Pattipawae
SASI Vol 24, No 1 (2018): Volume 24 Nomor 1, Januari - Juni 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v24i1.121

Abstract

The postponement of a State Administrative Decision which becomes the object of the dispute may be granted, since there is still a continuous factual action to be taken, namely the appointment of a definitive Regional Secretary, the inauguration or handover of the position of the dismissed Regional Secretary to the appointed Secretary of the Region whose contents as statements (declarations) of submission of all duties, powers and duties. Decree of the Governor of Maluku Number: 125.a Year 2014 dated May 20, 2014 concerning the Transfer of Civil Servants, on behalf of Kapressy Charles, SH. MSi, NIP: 19560911 198603 1 009 from Southwest Maluku District in Tiakur to the Government of Povinsi Maluku in Ambon, so Kapressy Charles, SH. Msi, felt his interest was damaged by the decision issued by the Governor of Maluku as the State Administration Officer. Therefore the concerned filed a lawsuit to the State Administrative Court of Ambon with Case No. 23/G/2014/PTUN.ABN, concerned requested to carry out the postponement of the transfer from the Government of the Southwest Maluku District to the Government of Maluku Province in due to the contradiction of the principles general good governance or prevailing laws and regulations.