Mahmud Mahmud
Universitas Azzahra, East Jakarta, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

THE LEGAL POSITION OF THE DIRJEN BINAWAS JAMSOSTEK POST-SOCIAL SECURITY DECREE NO. 27/PUU-IX/2011 OF ARTICLE 59-66 ACT NO. 13 the YEAR 2003 ON EMPLOYMENT Mahmud Mahmud
Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol 1 No 1 (2019): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), October 2019
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (305.122 KB) | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v1i1.17

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine the implementation of the post-impact Constitutional Court verdict No. 27/PUU-IX/2011, on the Outsourcing Labor regulation (power-over) in Indonesia. The study uses a normative juridical method of approach, by examining the library material or secondary data, named normative legal research or literature law research (in addition to research on sociological or empirical law which mainly examines primary data. The research results show that with the publication of circular letter number B. 31/PHIJSK/I/2012 The post of Constitutional Court ruling is irrelevant because the circular letter is not included Legislation. With the issuance of the circular letter is a legal action of the Government with the intention that there is no confusion in implementing the rules on outsourcing the post-Constitutional Court ruling and its supervision is implemented by the agency responsible for the field of employment
SETTLEMENT OF LAND DISPUTE RIGHTS ULAYAT PEOPLES KAJANG WITH PT. PP LONDON SUMATERA INDONESIA IN BULUKUMBA DISTRICT Mahmud Mahmud
Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol 1 No 2 (2020): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), February 2020
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (266.559 KB) | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v1i2.21

Abstract

This research aims to Can provide solutions to problems arising or encountered in the problem of agrarian law in particular regarding the resolution of land disputes in PT. PP London Sumatera Indonesia in Bulukumba District. The type of research used in this writing is empirical research or normative empirical, i.e. an approach that refers to the written rules or other legal materials that are secondary to see how the implementation/implementation through a field research conducted with sociology and interviews, so that the information obtained clarity about the investigation. The writing of this thesis also uses historical research as a complement to field data. Research on the author's history use in terms of the study of the indigenous Kajang tribe and the beginning of the entry PT. PP London Sumatera Indonesia in Bulukumba District. The result showed that Settlement of land dispute rights Ulayat people of Kajang tribe with PT. PP London Sumatera Indonesia has been pursued through litigation (judicial process) and non-litigation (alternate) lines. Dispute resolution through litigation is not able to properly and comprehensively describe disputes. This can be seen from the ruling of the Supreme Court Decree No. 2553/K/PDT/1987 dated 31 July 1990 which could not be executed properly in the execution caused by The legal factor itself (MA verdict) is a multi-interpretation, law enforcement factor (judge) in deciding the previous thing does not do field verification (object dispute), factors of facilities, infrastructure in terms of unclear boundaries and the factors of society that lack understanding the law of formal and cultural factors are not accommodated in the decision of the court.