Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Problematika Kemiskinan dan Optimalisasi Fungsi Zakat Ahmad Fathoni
Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Vol 5 No 2 (2011)
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic University of Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri, Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3108.136 KB) | DOI: 10.24090/mnh.v5i2.611

Abstract

Kemiskinan merupakan salah satu masalah mendasar yang dihadapi oleh umat Islam di Indonesia. Fenomena tersebut secara tidak langsung dapat membahayakan kekokohan akidah dan keimanan seseorang. Zakat, infaq dan sadaqah sebagai instrumen dalam pengentasan kemiskinan, tidak hanya menjadi persoalan pribadi, melainkan menjadi persoalan bersama. BAZ dan LAZ yang diatur dalam UU 38 Tahun 1999 tentang Pengelolaan Zakat, harus diakui bahwa upaya untuk melegalkan syari’ah zakat dalam bentuk undang-undang di negeri ini merupakan suatu kemajuan. Maka adalah suatu tanggung jawab  moral dan sosial  bagi setiap muslim  dan pemerintah untuk merealisasikannya. Sebab dengan regulasi, tata kelola, sosialisasi serta  pengelolaan dan pendayagunaan yang amanah, professional dan didukung dengan legalitas hukum yang kuat, pada akhirnya kesejahteraan masyarakat akan terwujudProverty phenomena is familiar with muslim life in Indonesia. This phenomena  is not directly implicated to  decline on the quality of akidah and faith. Zakat, infaq , and shadaqah are the instruments of abolishing proverty, which are not only seen as personal problem, but also communal problem. There fore, it must be seen as state responsibility. Badan Amil Zakat (BAZ) and Lembaga Amil Zakat (LAZ) are Islamic social  institution that regulated with the law of zakat number 38 of 1999, have to be professional, trusteeship, and having a high integrity to increase the society welfare. These are the importance  mission of this regulation is not enough strongly to regulate and to optimalize the management of zakat in Indonesia.
Gaps and Challenges in Child Marriage Regulation: An Indonesian and Australian Legal Perspective Imron Rosyadi; Muchlis Muchlis; Tajul Arifin; Ahmad Fathoni; Fahadil Amin Al Hasan
Justicia Islamica Vol 22 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia UIN Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/justicia.v22i2.11780

Abstract

Child marriage remains a persistent global issue, including in Indonesia and Australia. Despite legal frameworks that set a minimum age for marriage, the practice persists due to loopholes, socio-cultural factors, and weak enforcement. This study adopts a comparative legal approach by analysing statutory regulations, court decisions, and relevant academic literature within the contexts of Islamic law, Indonesian law, and Australian law. Findings reveal that the challenges in regulating child marriage are not purely juridical but are significantly influenced by psychosocial conditions. In Indonesia, the prevalence of marriage dispensations and cultural norms that tolerate early marriage creates a tension between legal norms and social realities. In contrast, Australia, while having a stronger legal framework and a relatively low prevalence, still allows dispensations for those aged 16–17 and faces cases of forced marriage within migrant communities, compounded by limited national data. The study’s contribution lies in demonstrating the importance of a legal-psychosocial perspective for understanding and addressing child marriage regulation. Protecting children’s rights, therefore, requires not only normative reforms but also comprehensive social interventions that address underlying cultural and structural drivers.
Islamic Family Law and International Inheritance: An Analysis of Mixed Marriages from the Perspective of International Civil Law Sahrul Hanafi; Nurman Akhmadi; Siah Khosyi’ah; Ahmad Fathoni
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1769

Abstract

Globalization has increased the number of mixed-nationality and interfaith marriages, giving rise to cross-jurisdictional legal complexities, particularly for Muslim parties. This study aims to analyze the application of the principles of Private International Law—namely, lex patriae, lex domicilii, lex loci celebrationis, and lex rei sitae—in the resolution of disputes regarding mixed-nationality marriages and international inheritance. The methodology employed is normative legal research using a comparative law approach and analysis of court decisions. The results of the study indicate that the validity of mixed marriages is determined through a combination of formal requirements based on lex loci celebrationis and substantive requirements subject to lex patriae or lex domicilii, which often conflict with Sharia norms and the public policy of the forum state. In international inheritance, the differences between the faraidh system and Western law lead to fragmentation in dispute resolution, particularly regarding immovable property governed by lex rei sitae. To reduce legal uncertainty, cross-jurisdictional marriage contracts, international wills, mandatory bequests, and asset transfers that comply with the principle of dual compliance are necessary. This study underscores the importance of harmonizing national law, religious law, and human rights