Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Paradikma: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Penelitian Agama
Mutijah Mutijah
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS KEBERHASILAN BELAJAR MAHASISWA PENERIMA BEASISWA DI IAIN PURWOKERTO MENGGUNAKAN REGRESI LOGISTIK Mutijah Mutijah
Jurnal Penelitian Agama Vol 17 No 2 (2016)
Publisher : IAIN Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (430.339 KB) | DOI: 10.24090/jpa.v17i2.2016.pp230-250

Abstract

Abstract: The results of data analysis showed that disadvantaged-students scholarship and Bidik Misi scholarship recipients succeed in his studies indicated arnaverage IP obtained was 3.43 with details of 5.6% of the students received a designation of high academic ability and 94.4% received a designation capability extremely high academic. Meanwhile, scholarship recipients of non-disadvantaged-students and non-Bidik Misi scholarship have lower IP acquisition anaverage of 3.29 to 8.4% student predicate academic ability is low, 5.6% high, and very high 86.0%. There's no influence of economic factors of students with learning success, there is no effect between the origin of SMA / MA SMK to the success of learning, and there is influence between public or private schools of origin against the learning success. Keywords: Scholarship, Poor, Economic Factors.
Analysis of Error in Working of Questions on the Semester Final Exam of Mathematics Statistics for Students of UIN Saizu Purwokerto Mutijah Mutijah
PARADIKMA: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA Vol 16, No 1 (2023): PARADIKMA JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA (January - June 2023)
Publisher : Study Program of Mathematics Education of Unimed Postgraduate Program

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24114/paradikma.v16i1.46530

Abstract

Learning evaluation of the certain subject is important to be done in university. It is to be able to see, improve and increase the quality of learning outcomes. One  form of evaluation for a Mathematics Statistics course is the final semester exam, abbreviated as UAS. Purpose of this article to determine the error type of students  in working the final semester exam, percentage of students who do mistakes and amount of error on each type, as well the most mistakes . Research used a  quantitative descriptive method imposed on all of population as many as 98 respondents. Data collection used documentation and the data analysis that is statistics descriptive. Research results showed that as many as 14 type of error with one among them is findings a new of error type. Percentage of students do error on each type is the concept error 96.94%, principle 92.86%, fact 20.41%, conclusion no used correct reasoning 8.16% , error because procedure or algoritm  4.08%, skill error 21.43%, error without pattern 37.76%, technical 3.06%, and error in mark 5.1%, and successive types of error that is data error , operation , write the exact same long answer to two different questions, language interpretation, as well finishing error each of which is 1.02%. The same as in according of the type errors are found percentage of the number of errors that is 40.12%,  28, 09%, 6.17%, 2.47% , 1.23%, 6.48%, 11.42%, 0.93%, 1.54%, and the others is 0.31% respectively. Most mistakes  is the concept error.
Co-Authors