Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Litigasi Amsir
Khaerul Mannan
Fakultas Hukum Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Lontara: Antara Religiusitas dan Kepercayaan Patahillah Asba; Andi Andra Susastra; Khaerul Mannan
Jurnal Litigasi Amsir Vol 9 No 2 (2022): Februari
Publisher : Faculty of Law Andi Sapada Institute of Social Sciences and Business

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (654.927 KB)

Abstract

In general, the Bugis-Makassar people have known a belief before knowing Islam. Their belief is called attorioloang, and in some places, they call it attorioloang. In general, Bugis-Makassarese people have known a belief before knowing Islam. Their belief is called attorioloang, and in some places, they call it attorioloang. This research aims to find out the extent of the influence of Religion and Belief from Lontara's point of view. The results of the study show that the diversity and belief of the Bugis-Makassar people, which is identical to Islam, is still full of syncretism practices between Islamic and pre-Islamic teachings. This belief is sometimes associated with sacred places such as Mount Bawakaraeng in Gowa or Bulu' Iowa in Amparita (Sidrap). Some esoteric texts, which are highly sacred by their adherents, contain teachings that marry Islamic Sufism with the concept of divinity (theology) and the concept of the pre-Islamic Bugis-Makassar universe (cosmology).
Gugatan Sederhana Dalam Proses Beracara Herul; Kairuddin Karim; Abdillah AR; Khaerul Mannan
Jurnal Litigasi Amsir Vol 9 No 2 (2022): Februari
Publisher : Faculty of Law Andi Sapada Institute of Social Sciences and Business

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (618.078 KB)

Abstract

This study aims to find out the rules that were changed in the Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2015 after the issuance of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2019 concerning Procedures for Settlement of Simple Lawsuits and to find out the process of proceedings for simple lawsuits based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2019 concerning Simple Lawsuit Settlement Procedures. This research uses normative legal research, using a research approach, namely the statute approach or juridical approach. Research results in The legal substance that was amended in Perma Number 2 of 2015 After the issuance of Perma Number 4 of 2019 concerning Procedures for Settlement of Simple Lawsuits, such as the amount of the value of the material lawsuit, the domicile of the defendant, regarding the use of electronic administration, regarding the presence of the parties in the trial, regarding the placement confiscation of guarantees, concerning claims which were acknowledged and refuted by the defendants, concerning decisions which were not objected to and concerning the determination of security (execution).
Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Tindakan Pencemaran Nama Baik Aftar Akbar; Khaerul Mannan; Iswandy Rani Saputra
Jurnal Litigasi Amsir 2023: (Special Issue) September-Oktober
Publisher : Faculty of Law Andi Sapada Institute of Social Sciences and Business

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to find out about the application of criminal law in Decision No.219/Pid.Sus/2019/Pn.Pre and also to find out about the legal considerations of judges in imposing Decision No.219/Pid.Sus/2019/Pn.Pre. The type of research to be carried out is the normative approach method. The normative approach or commonly referred to as doctrinal research is an approach that is carried out by means of regulations reviewing literary materials such as legislation, theories, and legal principles related to the problem being tested. The application of the criminal law for defamation based on the Decision of the Parepare District Court No.219/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Pre which states that the prosecution of the public prosecutor is unacceptable and the Defendant is immediately released from Detention is correct and appropriate based on applicable law. Furthermore, the legal considerations of the case judge No.219/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Pre stated that the phrase in Article 319 of the Criminal Code, namely "except under Article 316" was declared contrary to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and has no force. legally binding. So the consequence is that every government official or state official who feels insulted or defamed must report the offense himself. It is appropriate according to law and in line with the decision of the constitutional court No.31/PUU-XIII/2015. As a suggestion, it is hoped that investigators from the police are not in a hurry to determine someone who is being reported to be named a suspect and the prosecutor's office as a research prosecutor and at the same time acts as a public prosecutor to be careful and thorough in declaring a case to be complete and it is also hoped that the police and the Attorney General's Office to study more deeply about the application of the criminal complaint law so that in the future there will be no community members who feel disadvantaged due to an error in the application of the law and carefully consider taking measures to restrain the suspect/defendant.
Melangkah ke dalam Kegelapan: Kajian Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan dalam Pengaruh Alkohol Emil Fitra Nur; Muhammad Natsir; Phireri Phireri; Khaerul Mannan
Jurnal Litigasi Amsir Vol 11 No 3 (2024): Mei
Publisher : Faculty of Law Andi Sapada Institute of Social Sciences and Business

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the considerations made by the panel of judges in delivering a decision on a murder case influenced by alcohol, as seen in Decision Number 62/Pid.B/2022/PN.Bar. Additionally, it investigates the application of the law by the panel of judges in reaching a verdict concerning this crime. This research adopts a normative approach, utilizing both statutory analysis and a case study. The findings reveal that the judge's decision-making process in the aforementioned case, Decision Number 62/Pid.B/2022/PN.Bar, was based on juridical considerations, including the evidence presented during the trial, as well as non-juridical factors, such as aggravating and mitigating circumstances related to the defendant. The application of the law by the panel of judges in delivering a verdict on the crime of murder influenced by alcohol in Decision Number 62/Pid.B/2022/PN.Bar was deemed appropriate and in accordance with the primary indictment put forth by the public prosecutor. The defendant's actions were considered both lawful and convincing, leading to a sentence of 7 (seven) years of imprisonment.
Co-Authors Abdillah AR Aftar Akbar Andi Andra Susastra Emil Fitra Nur Herul Kairuddin Karim Muhammad Natsir Patahillah Asba Phireri Phireri Saputra, Iswandy Rani